My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 371

    1.

    A comparison of the monetized impact of IQ decrements from mercury emissions.

    Griffiths C, McGartland A, Miller M.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jun;115(6):841-7. Epub 2007 Feb 26. Review.PMID: 17589589 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Public health and economic consequences of methyl mercury toxicity to the developing brain.

    Trasande L, Landrigan PJ, Schechter C.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2005 May;113(5):590-6.PMID: 15866768 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sector.

    Palmer K, Burtraw D, Shih JS.

    J Environ Manage. 2007 Apr;83(1):115-30. Epub 2006 May 23.PMID: 16716494 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Assessing and managing methylmercury risks associated with power plant mercury emissions in the United States.

    Charnley G.

    MedGenMed. 2006 Mar 9;8(1):64. Review.PMID: 16915194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Mental retardation and prenatal methylmercury toxicity.

    Trasande L, Schechter CB, Haynes KA, Landrigan PJ.

    Am J Ind Med. 2006 Mar;49(3):153-8.PMID: 16470549 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Applying cost analyses to drive policy that protects children: mercury as a case study.

    Trasande L, Schechter C, Haynes KA, Landrigan PJ.

    Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1076:911-23.PMID: 17119266 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury control technology applications on electric utility boilers.

    Srivastava RK, Sedman CB, Kilgroe JD, Smith D, Renninger S.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2001 Oct;51(10):1460-70.PMID: 11686251 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.

    Evans DA, Hobbs BF, Oren C, Palmer KL.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Jan 15;42(2):347-53.PMID: 18284129 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Emission projections for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Section 812 second prospective Clean Air Act cost/benefit analysis.

    Wilson JH Jr, Mullen MA, Bollman AD, Thesing KB, Salhotra M, Divita F Jr, Neumann JE, Price JC, DeMocker J.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008 May;58(5):657-72.PMID: 18512443 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    An ex post cost-benefit analysis of the nitrogen dioxide air pollution control program in Tokyo.

    Voorhees AS, Araki S, Sakai R, Sato H.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Mar;50(3):391-410.PMID: 10734711 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Dose-response relationship of prenatal mercury exposure and IQ: an integrative analysis of epidemiologic data.

    Axelrad DA, Bellinger DC, Ryan LM, Woodruff TJ.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Apr;115(4):609-15. Epub 2007 Jan 11.PMID: 17450232 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Analysis of PM2.5 using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP).

    Davidson K, Hallberg A, McCubbin D, Hubbell B.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Feb 1;70(3-4):332-46.PMID: 17365595 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Estimate of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from petroleum.

    Wilhelm SM.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Dec 15;35(24):4704-10. Review.PMID: 11775142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    A revised probabilistic estimate of the maternal methyl mercury intake dose corresponding to a measured cord blood mercury concentration.

    Stern AH.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Feb;113(2):155-63.PMID: 15687052 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    A new method to assess mercury emissions: a study of three coal-fired electric-generating power station configurations.

    Boylan HM, Cain RD, Kingston HM.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2003 Nov;53(11):1318-25.PMID: 14649751 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Costs and benefits of regulating mercury.

    Zeller D, Booth S.

    Science. 2005 Nov 4;310(5749):777-9; author reply 777-9. No abstract available. PMID: 16272100 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Assessing the health benefits of air pollution reduction for children.

    Wong EY, Gohlke J, Griffith WC, Farrow S, Faustman EM.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Feb;112(2):226-32.PMID: 14754578 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Use of genetic toxicology data in U.S. EPA risk assessment: the mercury study report as an example.

    Schoeny R.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104 Suppl 3:663-73.PMID: 8781402 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    A holistic look at minimizing adverse environmental impact under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act.

    Veil JA, Puder MG, Littleton DJ, Johnson N.

    ScientificWorldJournal. 2002 Apr 18;2 Suppl 1:41-57.PMID: 12805978 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    After the clean air mercury rule: prospects for reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants.

    Milford JB, Pienciak A.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Apr 15;43(8):2669-73.PMID: 19475932 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity