My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 232

    1.

    Credibility of scientists: industry versus public interest.

    Goozner M.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Mar;114(3):A147; author reply A148. No abstract available. PMID: 16507442 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Credibility of scientists: conflict of interest and bias.

    Sass J.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Mar;114(3):A147-8; author reply A148. No abstract available. PMID: 16526116 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Assessing the reliability and credibility of industry science and scientists.

    Barrow CS, Conrad JW Jr.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Feb;114(2):153-5.PMID: 16451847 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Phosphine toxicity: ethical questions.

    Anderson EL.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Feb;114(2):A84; author reply A84-5. No abstract available. PMID: 16451839 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Conflicts cause FDA to review advisory committees.

    Kondro W.

    CMAJ. 2006 Jul 4;175(1):23. No abstract available. PMID: 16818900 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Bioethicists find themselves the ones being scrutinized.

    Stolberg SG.

    NY Times (Print). 2001 Aug 2:A1, A16. No abstract available. PMID: 12154828 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Barking up the wrong tree? Industry funding of academic research. A case study with commentaries.

    Schrag B, Ferrell G, Weil V, Fiedler TJ.

    Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Oct;9(4):569-77; discussion 578-82.PMID: 14652905 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    EPA accused of conflict of interest over chemicals study.

    Brumfiel G.

    Nature. 2004 Nov 4;432(7013):6. No abstract available. PMID: 15525949 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Science, industry, and tobacco harm reduction: a case study of tobacco industry scientists' involvement in the National Cancer Institute's Smoking and Health Program, 1964-1980.

    Parascandola M.

    Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):338-49. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 16134578 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Panel's recommendations urge 'sufficient public transparency' in outside activities.

    Randal J, Travis K.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 2;96(11):819-20. No abstract available. PMID: 15173261 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Advisory committees at FDA: the Hinchey Amendment and "conflict of interest" waivers.

    Lietzan E.

    J Health Law. 2006 Fall;39(4):415-49.PMID: 17402656 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    NIH panel holds conflicts of interestmeeting.

    McLellan F.

    Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):872. No abstract available. PMID: 15032244 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Bad funding.

    [No authors listed]

    Nature. 2004 Nov 4;432(7013):1. No abstract available. PMID: 15525941 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Ethics. Testing pesticides on humans given qualified endorsement.

    Kaiser J.

    Science. 2004 Feb 27;303(5662):1272-3. No abstract available. PMID: 14988526 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    The case of Deborah Rice: who is the Environmental Protection Agency protecting?

    Needleman HL.

    PLoS Biol. 2008 May 13;6(5):e129. No abstract available. PMID: 18479187 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Industry testing of toxic pesticides on human subjects concluded "no effect," despite the evidence.

    Sass JB, Needleman HL.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Mar;112(3):A150-1; author reply A151-2; discussion A152-6. No abstract available. PMID: 14998762 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Corporate influence on chemical exposure levels.

    Silver K.

    Sci People. 1989 Jan-Feb;21(1):24-5. No abstract available. PMID: 16408358 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Environmental journals feel pressure to adopt disclosure rules.

    Thacker PD.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Nov 15;40(22):6873-5. No abstract available. PMID: 17153989 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Testing toxic compounds in human subjects: ethical standards and good science.

    Goldman LR, Links JM.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(8):A458-9. No abstract available. PMID: 15175189 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Uncertain exposures and the privilege of imperception: activist scientists and race at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

    Murphy M.

    Osiris. 2004;19:266-82.PMID: 15484391 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity