My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 187

    1.

    The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area.

    Wiedemann PM, Schütz H.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Apr;113(4):402-5.PMID: 15811829 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    [The precautionary principle: advantages and risks]

    Tubiana M.

    J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80. French. PMID: 11319454 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?

    Otto M, von Mühlendahl KE.

    Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Oct;210(5):635-44. Epub 2007 Aug 31. Review.PMID: 17765660 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields--a survey among general practitioners.

    Huss A, Röösli M.

    BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 30;6:267.PMID: 17074080 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks]

    Tubiana M.

    Bull Acad Natl Med. 2000;184(5):969-93. French. PMID: 11077719 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Perception of mobile phone and base station risks.

    Siegrist M, Earle TC, Gutscher H, Keller C.

    Risk Anal. 2005 Oct;25(5):1253-64.PMID: 16297229 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Public perception of risk concerning celltowers and mobile phones.

    Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M.

    Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49(1):62-6.PMID: 15040130 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    [In the consumers' interest: precautionary principles for protection against electromagnetic fields]

    Dehos A, Weiss W.

    Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Dec;64(12):651-6. German. PMID: 12516016 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    [Electrosmog, cellular phones, sunbeds etc. -- adverse health effects from radiation? Health aspects of non-ionizing radiation]

    Bernhardt JH.

    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Jan;48(1):63-75. Review. German. PMID: 15650908 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.

    Hardell L, Sage C.

    Biomed Pharmacother. 2008 Feb;62(2):104-9. Epub 2007 Dec 31. Review.PMID: 18242044 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations.

    Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M.

    Occup Environ Med. 2006 May;63(5):307-13.PMID: 16621850 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland.

    Schreier N, Huss A, Röösli M.

    Soz Praventivmed. 2006;51(4):202-9.PMID: 17193782 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    The precautionary principle in the context of mobile phone and base station radiofrequency exposures.

    Dolan M, Rowley J.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Sep;117(9):1329-32. Epub 2009 May 18.PMID: 19750093 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    The question of health effects from exposure to electromagnetic fields.

    Hendee WR, Boteler JC.

    Health Phys. 1994 Feb;66(2):127-36. Review.PMID: 8282552 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Attitudes about electric and magnetic fields: do scientists and other risk experts perceive risk similarly?

    McMahan S, Lutz R, Meyer J.

    J Environ Health. 2002 Dec;65(5):9-12, 34; quiz 37-8.PMID: 12491849 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Transparent Democratic Foresight Strategies in the California EMF Program.

    Neutra RR, Delpizzo V.

    Public Health Rep. 2002 Nov-Dec;117(6):553-63.PMID: 12576535 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    WHO health risk assessment process for static fields.

    van Deventer TE, Saunders R, Repacholi MH.

    Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005 Feb-Apr;87(2-3):355-63.PMID: 15556671 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Risk perception, somatization, and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields--a randomized survey study.

    Frick U, Rehm J, Eichhammer P.

    Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Jul;205(5):353-60.PMID: 12173533 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies.

    Kheifets L, Sahl JD, Shimkhada R, Repacholi MH.

    Risk Anal. 2005 Aug;25(4):927-35.PMID: 16268940 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Implementing the precautionary principle.

    deFur PL, Kaszuba M.

    Sci Total Environ. 2002 Apr 8;288(1-2):155-65.PMID: 12013543 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity