My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 258

    1.

    Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

    Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD001546. Review.PMID: 15495014 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

    Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001546. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(4):CD001546. PMID: 11869603 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense.

    Eypasch E, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA.

    Dig Surg. 2002;19(6):518-22.PMID: 12499748 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

    Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS.

    Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83.PMID: 10526524 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: time to decide.

    Fingerhut A, Millat B, Borrie F.

    World J Surg. 1999 Aug;23(8):835-45. Review.PMID: 10415210 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases.

    Esposito C, Borzi P, Valla JS, Mekki M, Nouri A, Becmeur F, Allal H, Settimi A, Shier F, Sabin MG, Mastroianni L.

    World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):750-5.PMID: 17361358 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    [Acute appendicitis--laparoscopic appendectomy--indications and outcomes]

    Weiner RA, Blanco ER, Weiner S.

    Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002;119:204-9. German. PMID: 12704883 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Laparoscopic versus traditional appendectomy for suspected appendicitis.

    Schirmer BD, Schmieg RE Jr, Dix J, Edge SB, Hanks JB.

    Am J Surg. 1993 Jun;165(6):670-5.PMID: 8506965 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.

    Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V.

    Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.PMID: 17879676 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B.

    Am J Surg. 1995 Feb;169(2):208-12; discussion 212-3.PMID: 7840381 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Needlescopic, laparoscopic, and open appendectomy: a comparative study.

    Huang MT, Wei PL, Wu CC, Lai IR, Chen RJ, Lee WJ.

    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Oct;11(5):306-12. Erratum in: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002 Aug;12(4):following table of contents. PMID: 11668227 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Is laparoscopic appendectomy useful for the treatment of acute appendicitis in Korea? A meta-analysis.

    Kim CB, Kim MS, Hong JH, Lee HY, Yu SH.

    Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):7-16.PMID: 15004862 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.

    Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK.

    J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5.PMID: 17617333 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.

    Sanabria AE, Morales CH, Villegas MI.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004778. Review.PMID: 16235381 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

    Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD003677. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD003677. PMID: 15674911 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.

    Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Zheng F, Qiu WS, Guo WP, Chen TF, Wang TB.

    Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun 11. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 19517167 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    17.

    Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilisation.

    Kulier R, Boulvain M, Walker D, De Candolle G, Campana A.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD001328. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001328. PMID: 12137624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometriomata.

    Hart RJ, Hickey M, Maouris P, Buckett W.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD004992. Review.PMID: 18425908 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Comparison between open and laparoscopic appendectomy in non-complicated appendicitis.

    Delgado Cifuentes AF, Sotomayor RK.

    Bol Asoc Med P R. 2008 Jan-Mar;100(1):20-5.PMID: 18763393 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis.

    Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D.

    J Am Coll Surg. 1998 May;186(5):545-53.PMID: 9583695 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity