Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 127

    1.

    The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay: an overview.

    Owens W, Koëter HB.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1527-9.PMID: 12948895 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: coded single-dose studies.

    Kanno J, Onyon L, Peddada S, Ashby J, Jacob E, Owens W.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1550-8.PMID: 12948897 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dose-response studies.

    Kanno J, Onyon L, Peddada S, Ashby J, Jacob E, Owens W.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1530-49.PMID: 12948896 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.

    Kanno J, Onyon L, Haseman J, Fenner-Crisp P, Ashby J, Owens W; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Aug;109(8):785-94.PMID: 11564613 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay. Phase 2: dietary phytoestrogen analyses.

    Owens W, Ashby J, Odum J, Onyon L.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1559-67.PMID: 12948898 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The OECD program to validate the rat Hershberger bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo androgen and antiandrogen responses: phase 2 dose-response studies.

    Owens W, Gray LE, Zeiger E, Walker M, Yamasaki K, Ashby J, Jacob E.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2007 May;115(5):671-8. Epub 2007 Jan 17.PMID: 17520051 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Validation study of OECD rodent uterotrophic assay for the assessment of estrogenic activity in Sprague-Dawley immature female rats.

    Kim HS, Kang TS, Kang IH, Kim TS, Moon HJ, Kim IY, Ki H, Park KL, Lee BM, Yoo SD, Han SY.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 Dec 10;68(23-24):2249-62.PMID: 16326438 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Sensitivity of the immature rat uterotrophic assay to mixtures of estrogens.

    Tinwell H, Ashby J.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Apr;112(5):575-82.PMID: 15064164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    The influence of dietary isoflavone on the uterotrophic response in juvenile rats.

    Wade MG, Lee A, McMahon A, Cooke G, Curran I.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Nov;41(11):1517-25.PMID: 12963004 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Impact of the phytoestrogen content of laboratory animal feed on the gene expression profile of the reproductive system in the immature female rat.

    Naciff JM, Overmann GJ, Torontali SM, Carr GJ, Tiesman JP, Daston GP.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Nov;112(15):1519-26.PMID: 15531437 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.

    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials.

    Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Review.PMID: 18328408 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    The intact immature rodent uterotrophic bioassay: possible effects on assay sensitivity of vomeronasal signals from male rodents and strain differences.

    Ashby J, Owens W, Odum J, Tinwell H.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Sep;111(12):1568-70.PMID: 12948899 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Comparative responses of three rat strains (DA/Han, Sprague-Dawley and Wistar) to treatment with environmental estrogens.

    Diel P, Schmidt S, Vollmer G, Janning P, Upmeier A, Michna H, Bolt HM, Degen GH.

    Arch Toxicol. 2004 Apr;78(4):183-93. Epub 2003 Dec 20.PMID: 14689164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Natural variability and the influence of concurrent control values on the detection and interpretation of low-dose or weak endocrine toxicities.

    Ashby J, Tinwell H, Odum J, Lefevre P.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Jun;112(8):847-53.PMID: 15175171 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    OECD validation of the Hershberger assay in Japan: phase 2 dose response of methyltestosterone, vinclozolin, and p,p'-DDE.

    Yamasaki K, Sawaki M, Ohta R, Okuda H, Katayama S, Yamada T, Ohta T, Kosaka T, Owens W.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Dec;111(16):1912-9.PMID: 14644666 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Evaluation of Tier I screening approaches for detecting endocrine-active compounds (EACs).

    O'Connor JC, Cook JC, Marty MS, Davis LG, Kaplan AM, Carney EW.

    Crit Rev Toxicol. 2002;32(6):521-49. Review.PMID: 12487364 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Gestational and lactational exposure to ethinyl estradiol, but not bisphenol A, decreases androgen-dependent reproductive organ weights and epididymal sperm abundance in the male long evans hooded rat.

    Howdeshell KL, Furr J, Lambright CR, Wilson VS, Ryan BC, Gray LE Jr.

    Toxicol Sci. 2008 Apr;102(2):371-82. Epub 2007 Dec 20.PMID: 18096570 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data