My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 105

    1.

    Methods for reliability and uncertainty assessment and for applicability evaluations of classification- and regression-based QSARs.

    Eriksson L, Jaworska J, Worth AP, Cronin MT, McDowell RM, Gramatica P.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1361-75. Review.PMID: 12896860 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling.

    Weaver S, Gleeson MP.

    J Mol Graph Model. 2008 Jun;26(8):1315-26. Epub 2008 Jan 18.PMID: 18328754 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology.

    Perkins R, Fang H, Tong W, Welsh WJ.

    Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1666-79. Review.PMID: 12924569 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

    Cronin MT, Jaworska JS, Walker JD, Comber MH, Watts CD, Worth AP.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1391-401. Review.PMID: 12896862 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.

    Tong W, Xie Q, Hong H, Shi L, Fang H, Perkins R.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Aug;112(12):1249-54.PMID: 15345371 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints.

    Jaworska JS, Comber M, Auer C, Van Leeuwen CJ.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1358-60.PMID: 12896859 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes.

    Tunkel J, Mayo K, Austin C, Hickerson A, Howard P.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Apr 1;39(7):2188-99.PMID: 15871254 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment.

    Bouwman T, Cronin MT, Bessems JG, van de Sandt JJ.

    Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008 Apr;27(4):269-76.PMID: 18684796 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances.

    Cronin MT, Walker JD, Jaworska JS, Comber MH, Watts CD, Worth AP.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Aug;111(10):1376-90. Review.PMID: 12896861 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    The specificity of the QSAR models for regulatory purposes: the example of the DEMETRA project.

    Benfenati E.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2007 May-Jun;18(3-4):209-20.PMID: 17514566 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Publicly-accessible QSAR software tools developed by the Joint Research Centre.

    Pavan M, Worth AP.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2008 Oct;19(7-8):785-99.PMID: 19061088 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments.

    Comber MH, Walker JD, Watts C, Hermens J.

    Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1822-8. Review.PMID: 12924581 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals.

    Bradbury SP, Russom CL, Ankley GT, Schultz TW, Walker JD.

    Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1789-98. Review.PMID: 12924578 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Predictivity of QSAR.

    Benigni R, Bossa C.

    J Chem Inf Model. 2008 May;48(5):971-80. Epub 2008 Apr 22.PMID: 18426198 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    QSAR model for predicting pesticide aquatic toxicity.

    Mazzatorta P, Smiesko M, Lo Piparo E, Benfenati E.

    J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Nov-Dec;45(6):1767-74.PMID: 16309283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Diagnostic tools to determine the quality of "transparent" regression-based QSARs: the "modelling power" plot.

    Sagrado S, Cronin MT.

    J Chem Inf Model. 2006 May-Jun;46(3):1523-32.PMID: 16711772 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments.

    Russom CL, Breton RL, Walker JD, Bradbury SP.

    Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Aug;22(8):1810-21. Review.PMID: 12924580 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.

    Tetko IV, Sushko I, Pandey AK, Zhu H, Tropsha A, Papa E, Oberg T, Todeschini R, Fourches D, Varnek A.

    J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Sep;48(9):1733-46. Epub 2008 Aug 26.PMID: 18729318 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Prediction of PAH mutagenicity in human cells by QSAR classification.

    Papa E, Pilutti P, Gramatica P.

    SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;19(1-2):115-27.PMID: 18311639 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles.

    Liu H, Papa E, Gramatica P.

    Chem Res Toxicol. 2006 Nov;19(11):1540-8.PMID: 17112243 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity