My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination
  • Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Results: 1 to 20 of 227

1.

Nuclear waste transportation: case studies of identifying stakeholder risk information needs.

Drew CH, Grace DA, Silbernagel SM, Hemmings ES, Smith A, Griffith WC, Takaro TK, Faustman EM.

Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Mar;111(3):263-72.PMID: 12611653 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

2.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.PMID: 14698953 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

3.

Collaboration versus communication: The Department of Energy's Amchitka Island and the Aleut Community.

Burger J, Gochfeld M, Pletnikoff K.

Environ Res. 2009 May;109(4):503-10. Epub 2009 Mar 4.PMID: 19264301 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

4.

Changes in Aleut concerns following the stakeholder-driven Amchitka independent science assessment.

Burger J, Gochfeld M.

Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1156-69.PMID: 19178657 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

5.

Recent trends and developments in dialogue on radioactive waste management: experience from the UK.

Kemp RV, Bennett DG, White MJ.

Environ Int. 2006 Dec;32(8):1021-32. Epub 2006 Jul 17. Review.PMID: 16844222 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

6.

Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project.

Drew CH, Nyerges TL, Leschine TM.

Risk Anal. 2004 Dec;24(6):1641-64.PMID: 15660618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

7.

Science, policy, and stakeholders: developing a consensus science plan for Amchitka Island, Aleutians, Alaska.

Burger J, Gochfeld M, Kosson DS, Powers CW, Friedlander B, Eichelberger J, Barnes D, Duffy LK, Jewett SC, Volz CD.

Environ Manage. 2005 May;35(5):557-68.PMID: 15886955 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

8.

Application of life cycle thinking in multi-disciplinary multi-stakeholder contexts for cross-sectoral planning and implementation of sustainable development projects.

Thabrew L, Ries RJ.

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2009 Mar 20:1. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 19301944 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

9.

Risk perception in context: the Savannah River Site Stakeholder Study.

Williams BL, Brown S, Greenberg M, Kahn MA.

Risk Anal. 1999 Dec;19(6):1019-35.PMID: 10765444 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

10.

Warren K. Sinclair keynote address: contemporary issues in risk-informed decision making on the disposition of radioactive waste.

Garrick BJ.

Health Phys. 2006 Nov;91(5):430-8.PMID: 17033453 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

11.

Low-activity radioactive materials management at the U.S. Department of Energy.

Marcinowski F, Tonkay DW.

Health Phys. 2006 Nov;91(5):498-501. Review.PMID: 17033462 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

12.

Attitudes and risk perceptions of stakeholders in a nuclear waste siting issue.

Sjöberg L.

Risk Anal. 2003 Aug;23(4):739-49.PMID: 12926567 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

13.

Scientific research, stakeholders, and policy: continuing dialogue during research on radionuclides on Amchitka Island, Alaska.

Burger J, Gochfeld M, Powers CW, Kosson DS, Halverson J, Siekaniec G, Morkill A, Patrick R, Duffy LK, Barnes D.

J Environ Manage. 2007 Oct;85(1):232-44. Epub 2006 Dec 18.PMID: 17175094 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

14.

Resolving public conflict in site selection process-a risk communication approach.

Ishizaka K, Tanaka M.

Waste Manag. 2003;23(5):385-96.PMID: 12893010 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

15.

Risk-informed radioactive waste classification and reclassification.

Croff AG.

Health Phys. 2006 Nov;91(5):449-60. Review.PMID: 17033455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

16.

A model for selecting bioindicators to monitor radionuclide concentrations using Amchitka Island in the Aleutians as a case study.

Burger J.

Environ Res. 2007 Nov;105(3):316-23. Epub 2007 Aug 14.PMID: 17698056 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

17.

A decision theory perspective on the disposal of high-level radioactive waste.

Garrick BJ, Kaplan S.

Risk Anal. 1999 Oct;19(5):903-13.PMID: 10765438 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

18.

Risk perception, risk communication, and stakeholder involvement for biosolids management and research.

Beecher N, Harrison E, Goldstein N, McDaniel M, Field P, Susskind L.

J Environ Qual. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):122-8. Review.PMID: 15647541 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

19.

Perceived risks of radioactive waste transport through Oregon: results of a statewide survey.

MacGregor D, Slovic P, Mason RG, Detweiler J, Binney SE, Dodd B.

Risk Anal. 1994 Feb;14(1):5-14.PMID: 8146403 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

20.

Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites.

Arvai J, Gregory R.

Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Apr 15;37(8):1469-76.PMID: 12731826 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Find related data

Recent activity