Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 108

    1.

    Assessing assays.

    Schmidt CW.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2002 May;110(5):A248-51. No abstract available. PMID: 12003768 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The utility of genetically modified mouse assays for identifying human carcinogens: a basic understanding and path forward. The Alternatives to Carcinogenicity Testing Committee ILSI HESI.

    MacDonald J, French JE, Gerson RJ, Goodman J, Inoue T, Jacobs A, Kasper P, Keller D, Lavin A, Long G, McCullough B, Sistare FD, Storer R, van der Laan JW.

    Toxicol Sci. 2004 Feb;77(2):188-94. Epub 2003 Dec 2. Review.PMID: 14657512 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Assessment of carcinogenicity using transgenic animals.

    Mitsumori K, Nishikawa A.

    J Toxicol Sci. 1996 Dec;21(5):479-82. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 9035058 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Interpretations of primary carcinogenicity data in 29 trichloroethylene risk assessments.

    Rudén C.

    Toxicology. 2001 Dec 28;169(3):209-25.PMID: 11718961 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans.

    Boobis AR, Cohen SM, Dellarco V, McGregor D, Meek ME, Vickers C, Willcocks D, Farland W.

    Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006 Nov-Dec;36(10):781-92.PMID: 17118728 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    A prelude to debate--The utility of transgenic assays in the detection and interpretation of carcinogenic responses.

    Cebula TA, Hoffmann GR.

    Environ Mol Mutagen. 2001;37(1):85. No abstract available. PMID: 11170245 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Transgenic rodents in toxicology.

    Dayan AD.

    Int J Exp Pathol. 1996 Dec;77(6):251-6. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 9155658 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Development of a tolerable daily intake for N-nitrosodimethylamine using a modified benchmark dose methodology.

    Fitzgerald DJ, Robinson NI.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2007 Oct;70(19):1670-8.PMID: 17763085 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    The relevance of mechanistic data to the interpretation and extrapolation to humans of rodent carcinogenicity data.

    Ashby J.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Sep;105(9):902-3. No abstract available. PMID: 9341097 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Appropriate models and an understanding of carcinogenic mechanisms--requirements for hazard risk assessment.

    Fukushima S, Moore MA, Tsuda H.

    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2003 Jan-Mar;4(1):75-8.PMID: 12718706 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    RITA--Registry of Industrial Toxicology Animal-data: optimization of carcinogenicity bioassays.

    Mohr U.

    Exp Toxicol Pathol. 1999 Nov;51(6):461-75. No abstract available. PMID: 10661804 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Animal carcinogenicity studies: implications for the REACH system.

    Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Mar;34 Suppl 1:139-47.PMID: 16555967 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Scientific method and risk assessment.

    Barnard RC.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1994 Apr;19(2):211-8. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 8041918 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Animal carcinogenicity studies: 3. Alternatives to the bioassay.

    Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Feb;34(1):39-48.PMID: 16522149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Animal carcinogenicity studies: 1. Poor human predictivity.

    Knight A, Bailey J, Balcombe J.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2006 Feb;34(1):19-27.PMID: 16522147 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Putting the Predictive Toxicology Challenge into perspective: reflections on the results.

    Benigni R, Giuliani A.

    Bioinformatics. 2003 Jul 1;19(10):1194-200. Review.PMID: 12835261 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?

    Gaylor DW.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;41(2):128-33. Epub 2004 Dec 19.PMID: 15698536 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Usefulness of biomarkers in population studies: from exposure to susceptibility and to prediction of cancer.

    Au WW.

    Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 May;210(3-4):239-46. Epub 2006 Dec 14. Review.PMID: 17174154 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The Society of Toxicologic Pathology's position on statistical methods for rodent carcinogenicity studies.

    Morton D.

    Toxicol Pathol. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):670-2. No abstract available. PMID: 11794383 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    The relevance of rodent tumors in assessing carcinogenicity in human beings.

    Kuschner M.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Apr;21(2):250-1. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 7644714 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data