Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 128

    1.

    Smelling in color: a rainbow of possibilities.

    Potera C.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Mar;109(3):A128-31.PMID: 11333206 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Monitoring of biological odour filtration in closed environments with olfactometry and an electronic nose.

    Willers H, de Gijsel P, Ogink N, D'Amico A, Martinelli E, Di Natale C, van Ras N, van der Waarde J.

    Water Sci Technol. 2004;50(4):93-100.PMID: 15484747 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Evaluation of a fast wastewater odour characterisation procedure using a chemical sensor array.

    Ziya Oztürk Z, Tasaltin C, Engin GO, Gürek AG, Atilla D, Ahsen V, Ince M.

    Environ Monit Assess. 2009 Apr;151(1-4):369-75. Epub 2008 Apr 12.PMID: 18409012 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Characterization of exposure in odour annoyance situations.

    Harssema H.

    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci. 1987;15:95-104. No abstract available. PMID: 3569106 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Odour sampling 1: Physical chemistry considerations.

    Hudson N, Ayoko GA.

    Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jul;99(10):3982-92. Epub 2007 Jun 26. Review.PMID: 17596941 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    'Electronic nose'--new condition monitoring devices for environmental applications.

    Persaud KC, Wareham P, Pisanelli AM, Scorsone E.

    Chem Senses. 2005 Jan;30 Suppl 1:i252-3. No abstract available. PMID: 15738142 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Sensor arrays: an inspired idea or an objective measurement of environmental odours?

    Stuetz RM, Nicolas J.

    Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):53-8.PMID: 11762483 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Odor frequency and odor annoyance. Part I: assessment of frequency, intensity and hedonic tone of environmental odors in the field.

    Sucker K, Both R, Bischoff M, Guski R, Winneke G.

    Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):671-82. Epub 2007 Oct 12.PMID: 17932684 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Use of electronic noses for detection of odour from animal production facilities: a review.

    Nimmermark S.

    Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):33-41. Review.PMID: 11762481 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Study of odor recorder for dynamical change of odor.

    Nakamoto T.

    Chem Senses. 2005 Jan;30 Suppl 1:i254-5. No abstract available. PMID: 15738143 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices: a review.

    Hudson N, Ayoko GA.

    Bioresour Technol. 2008 Jul;99(10):3993-4007. Epub 2007 May 23. Review.PMID: 17512194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    An optoelectronic nose: "seeing" smells by means of colorimetric sensor arrays.

    Suslick KS.

    MRS Bull. 2004 Oct;29(10):720-5.PMID: 15991401 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.

    Ritter L, Solomon K, Sibley P, Hall K, Keen P, Mattu G, Linton B.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. Review.PMID: 11809004 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    The performance of the human nose in odour measurement.

    Walker JC.

    Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):1-7.PMID: 11762448 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Annoyance potentials of air pollution odors.

    Dravnieks A, O'Neill HJ.

    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 Feb;40(2):85-95.PMID: 495449 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Odor frequency and odor annoyance Part II: dose-response associations and their modification by hedonic tone.

    Sucker K, Both R, Bischoff M, Guski R, Krämer U, Winneke G.

    Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 May;81(6):683-94. Epub 2007 Sep 29.PMID: 17906873 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Setting up and use of population panels for measuring and monitoring annoyance.

    Punter PH.

    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci. 1987;15:105-16. No abstract available. PMID: 3569074 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Sensor fusion for taste sensor and odor sensor.

    Katsube T, Umetani S, Shi L, Hasegawa Y.

    Chem Senses. 2005 Jan;30 Suppl 1:i260-1. No abstract available. PMID: 15738146 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Detection of the dynamics of odour emissions from pig farms using dynamic olfactometry and an electronic odour sensor.

    Brose G, Gallmann E, Hartung E, Jungbluth T.

    Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):59-64.PMID: 11762484 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Odour potential and annoyance.

    Diaper J.

    Dev Toxicol Environ Sci. 1987;15:147-52. No abstract available. PMID: 3569079 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data