My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 188

    1.

    EPA: airing on the side of caution or pulling standards out of thin Air?

    Breslin K.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):A176-7.PMID: 10753106 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Silenced science: air pollution decision-making at the EPA threatens public health.

    Rest K.

    New Solut. 2007;17(1-2):13-6.PMID: 17434855 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Key scientific findings and policy- and health-relevant insights from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Particulate Matter Supersites Program and related studies: an integration and synthesis of results.

    Solomon PA, Hopke PK, Froines J, Scheffe R.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58(13 Suppl):S3-92. Review.PMID: 19202993 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Fine particulate matter national ambient air quality standards: public health impact on populations in the northeastern United States.

    Johnson PR, Graham JJ.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Sep;113(9):1140-7.PMID: 16140618 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Evidence of political interference / EPA air pollution decision threatens public health: science disregarded, misrepresented on particulate matter standard.

    Union of Concerned Scientists.

    New Solut. 2007;17(1-2):7-11.PMID: 17434854 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Analysis of primary fine particle national ambient air quality standard metrics.

    Johnson PR, Graham JJ.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2006 Feb;56(2):206-18.PMID: 16568804 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Can varying concepts of susceptibility in risk assessment affect particulate matter standards?

    Parkin RT, Balbus JM.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2000 Aug;50(8):1417-25.PMID: 11002603 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Particulate Matter Supersites Program: an integrated synthesis of scientific findings and policy- and health-relevant insights.

    Solomon PA, Hopke PK.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2008;58(13 Suppl):S1-2. No abstract available. PMID: 19202992 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Methodologies for estimating emissions for the U.S. EPA's NOx SIP call, CER rule, and other complexities.

    Majeed MA.

    Environ Sci Technol. 2001 Nov 15;35(22):4408-13.PMID: 11757594 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).

    Burmaster DE, von Stackelberg KE.

    Qual Assur. 1992 Jun;1(3):192-206.PMID: 1344674 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Perspectives on air quality policy issues in Europe and North America.

    Krzyzanowski M, Vandenberg J, Stieb D.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005 Jul 9-23;68(13-14):1057-61.PMID: 16024487 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards.

    Brown KS.

    Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Apr;105(4):378-83. No abstract available. PMID: 9189700 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    The tobacco industry's political efforts to derail the EPA report on ETS.

    Muggli ME, Hurt RD, Repace J.

    Am J Prev Med. 2004 Feb;26(2):167-77. Review.PMID: 14751332 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.

    Sayeed SA.

    Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85.PMID: 16199687 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Use of an index to reflect the aggregate burden of long-term exposure to criteria air pollutants in the United States.

    Kyle AD, Woodruff TJ, Buffler PA, Davis DL.

    Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Feb;110 Suppl 1:95-102. Review.PMID: 11834467 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Setting ambient air quality standards for particulate matter.

    McClellan RO.

    Toxicology. 2002 Dec 27;181-182:329-47. Review.PMID: 12505334 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    The impact of background ozone on compliance with revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards.

    Williams DJ, Potter WT, Clarkson WW, Sanders DA, Stevens JE.

    J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2009 Jan;59(1):52-7.PMID: 19216188 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    EPA as a public health agency.

    Goldstein BD.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1988 Sep;8(3):328-34.PMID: 3238063 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The complexities of air pollution regulation: the need for an integrated research and regulatory perspective.

    Nadadur SS, Miller CA, Hopke PK, Gordon T, Vedal S, Vandenberg JJ, Costa DL.

    Toxicol Sci. 2007 Dec;100(2):318-27. Epub 2007 Jul 3. Review.PMID: 17609539 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Air pollution. Panel backs EPA and 'six cities' study.

    Kaiser J.

    Science. 2000 Aug 4;289(5480):711.PMID: 10950710 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity