Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure in different European countries: a young AEMIE questionnaire

Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1986;137(3):226-8.

Abstract

To compare diagnosis and treatment of heart failure among different European countries, an anonymous questionnaire was developed and sent to young AEMIE members all over Europe. 159 filled-in questionnaires were received: 30 p. 100 from France (F), 25 p. 100 from Great Britain (GB), 21 p. 100 from the Benelux countries (NL), 13 p. 100 from Italy (I) and 11 p. 100 from West-Germany (D). Baseline characteristics of the participating physicians (age, years of hospital training, available equipment, etc.) were comparable among the different countries. There was good agreement in the value of history, clinical examination, ECG and chest X-ray for the diagnosis of heart failure. In all countries breathlessness, basal crepitations and gallop rhythm were counted among the most important signs of left heart failure. Whereas the value of gated-blood-pool scanning and Holter monitoring as a first diagnostic approach was unanimously denied, the value of 2D-echocardiography in heart failure was discussed controversially: in I, F and D 50-80 p. 100 of the physicians thought echocardiography a first-hand diagnostic tool, whereas only 20-30 p. 100 of the physicians in GB and NL recommended echocardiography in the first place. Diuretics, sodium reduced diet and afterload reduction (in GB only) are the first therapeutic measures in GB, NL and F. However, in I and D digitalis is still the cornerstone of therapy (greater than or equal to 50 p. 100!). Physicians of all European countries with the exception of the physicians in D prefer pure digoxin as the first digitalis preparation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Europe
  • Heart Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Heart Diseases / drug therapy
  • Heart Diseases / therapy
  • Humans
  • Methods
  • Surveys and Questionnaires