Body mass index is related to unsuccessful puncture attempts and failure to axillary vein cannulation during ultrasound-guided cardiac electronic device implantation

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;61(2):253-259. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00800-3. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein cannulation is effective and safe during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). It is a reasonable alternative to other techniques in order to shorten procedural time and decrease perioperative complications. However, in this context, the short-axis (out-of-plane) visualization to guide the vein puncture is the most used technique. The aim of our study is to describe a single-center experience with the US long-axis (in-plane) technique defining predictors of unsuccessful puncture attempts and failure to axillary vein cannulation in a cohort of patients undergoing CIEDs procedures.

Methods: From November 2017 to June 2019, consecutive patients undergoing CIEDs procedures were enrolled in the study. US-guided long axis (in-plane) view to guide axillary vein cannulation was used in all subjects. Unsuccessful puncture attempts (UAs) and complete failures to cannulate the vein were collected for each procedure. All patients were evaluated on a daily basis until hospital discharge and at 1-month follow up visit.

Results: Among 119 subjects (M: F = 75:44), mean age was 79 ± 9 years, mean BMI 25.7 ± 4.3 kg/m2, and mean BSA 1.74 ± 0.4 m2. We placed 95 pacemakers (32 single-, 61 dual-, and 2 triple-chamber) and 20 ICDs (7 single, 6 dual, 7 triple chambers). An upgrade from dual-chamber to triple-chamber device was carried out with the addition of a new lead in 3 patients. During a system revision, one new electrode was implanted. The overall leads inserted were 204. There were 33 initial unsuccessful attempts in 22/119 patients. US-guided axillary access was finally successful in 94.9% of patients (113/119). In the other cases (6/119), cephalic vein was isolated or blinded subclavian puncture was performed. Interestingly, at univariate analysis, an increasing BMI and BSA, male sex, and anticoagulant therapy were predictors of unsuccessful attempts or failure to cannulate the vein with US. Among those subjects, the multivariate logistic regression showed significant correlations only between BMI and unsuccessful attempts: odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, p = 0.009 [95% CI = 1.04-1.31], and BMI with failure to cannulate the vein: OR = 1.21, p = 0.03 [95%CI = 1.01-1.45]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves individuated the best BMI value cutoff point at 27 kg/m2 (area under the curve [AUC]: 68.6%) having a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 66.5% for unsuccessful puncture attempts; a BMI value of 28 kg/m2 (AUC 74.9%) had a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 66.7% for failure to cannulate the vein with the US-guided approach.

Conclusions: Axillary vein long-axis (in-plane) US-guided cannulation during CIEDs implantation is characterized by a high success rate (94.9%). An elevated BMI is significantly related to unsuccessful puncture attempts or failure to cannulation. The higher is the BMI, the more are the chances to have difficult vein puncture or cannulation failure and to switch from US-guided approach to another technique.

Keywords: Axillary vein cannulation; BMI; CIED procedures; Pacemaker; Ultrasound-guided cannulation; Vascular complications.

MeSH terms

  • Axillary Vein / diagnostic imaging
  • Axillary Vein / surgery
  • Body Mass Index
  • Catheterization, Central Venous*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Electronics
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Punctures
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional