Relapse related to pushing and rebounding action in maxillary anterior downgraft with mandibular setback surgery

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Aug;46(8):1336-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 30.

Abstract

Purpose: Maxillary downgraft (MD) and mandibular setback (MS) are problematic procedures in terms of postoperative stability. While the amount of intraoperative clockwise rotation (CWR) of the proximal segment (PS) after MS combined with MD has a positive correlation with the amount of MD, mandibular relapse after MS with MD in relation to intraoperative CWR of the PS has not been reported. Moreover, the effect of mandibular relapse on maxillary stability after MS with MD remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mandibular and maxillary stability after MS with MD in relation to intraoperative CWR of the PS and amount of MD.

Materials and methods: The study included 57 patients who underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether MD was performed or not performed: Group I had 2 mm or more MD; and Group II had less than 2 mm MD including vertical impaction or no vertical changes. The amount of surgical movement and postoperative relapse were cephalometrically evaluated and statistically analyzed.

Results: There was no significant difference in MS between Groups I and II, however, the vertical movement of the maxilla was different significantly (p < 0.001). In Group I, the intraoperative CWR and postoperative CCWR of the PS was greater than that of Group II (p = 0.010; p < 0.001, respectively). Consequently, the anterior relapse of the mandible was greater in Group I than in Group II despite the same amount of MS in Groups I and II. In Group I, with direct bone contact using Le Fort I inclined osteotomy, vertical relapse at point A showed no statistical correlation with anterior relapse at point B, while the vertical and horizontal dental relapse at U1 showed significant correlations with anterior relapse at point B (r = -0.403, p = 0.030; r = 0.581, p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: For more stable results, Le Fort I inclined osteotomy is recommended to obtain direct bone contact when moving the maxilla inferiorly. The PS must also be fixed while maintaining vertical bone step to prevent CWR.

Keywords: Le Fort I osteotomy; Mandibular setback surgery; Maxillary downgraft; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

MeSH terms

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III / pathology
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III / surgery
  • Mandible / pathology
  • Mandible / surgery*
  • Maxilla / pathology
  • Maxilla / surgery*
  • Orthognathic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects*
  • Orthognathic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Osteotomy, Le Fort / adverse effects
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Recurrence
  • Young Adult