Evaluation of Non Invasive versus Invasive Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection among Patients with Gastroduodenal Disorders

Egypt J Immunol. 2016 Jun;23(2):39-49.

Abstract

H. pylori, a spiral gram-negative bacterium, is associated with gastroduodenal diseases. All H. pylori diagnostic assays have limitations. Cytotoxin-associated gene A (cag A), a virulence marker, can be identified by PCR. We evaluated H. pylori diagnostic methods, invasive: rapid urease test (RUT), and histopathological examination (HE), and serology as non-invasive method. Positive cases were studied for presence of cag A gene. Upper endoscopies and gastric biopsies were performed on 67 dyspeptic patients for RUT, HE and PCR. Anti H. pyloriIgG were measured by ELISA. Of 67 dyspeptic patients, 23 (34%) had more than one endoscopic finding, 46 (68.7%) were H.pylori positive by HE, and 21(31.3%) were negative with variable grades of mucosal antral neutrophil infiltration. Of the 46 HE positives, PCR detected CagA in 22 (47.8%). Using HE as the gold standard test, the sensitivity of ELISA and RUT was 93.48% and 86.96%, respectively; and the specificity was 85.71% and 47.62%, respectively. In conclusion, IgG detection by ELISA is a suitable screening test for diagnosis of H. pylori associated gastroduodenal diseases. Histopathology should be performed in ELISA negative cases to exclude infection.

MeSH terms

  • Antigens, Bacterial
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • Helicobacter Infections / complications
  • Helicobacter Infections / diagnosis*
  • Helicobacter pylori / immunology
  • Humans
  • Immunoglobulin G / analysis*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Stomach Diseases / complications*
  • Stomach Diseases / microbiology
  • Urease

Substances

  • Antigens, Bacterial
  • Immunoglobulin G
  • Urease