Evaluation of the effect of socio-economic status on performance in a Multiple Mini Interview for admission to medical school

Med Teach. 2015 Jan;37(1):59-63. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.923562. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

Abstract

Introduction: Widening participation in Medicine is a key policy priority as it helps promote a diverse and representative workforce and improves patient care. The selection process employed can influence the socio-economic composition of the student cohort and this study therefore evaluated whether Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) performance was influenced by school type or area-level Higher Education (HE) participation rates.

Methods: MMI performance for all UK applicants was recorded and consent to link performance with socio-economic data was requested using an applicant questionnaire. Station-level and total MMI scores, and offer rates were compared between applicants from non-selective, non-fee-paying schools and from selective and/or fee-paying schools; and between applicants from each quintile of area-level HE participation.

Results: 793 applicants were included in the analysis. MMI performance and offer rates were slightly higher for applicants from non-selective, non-fee-paying schools and/or from lower HE participation quintiles, but the effects were small and not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The MMI did not favour applicants from selective and/or fee-paying schools, or from areas with high HE participation rates. Work to evaluate whether the relationship between MMI and medical school performance is the same for all sub-groups of students is now required.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic*
  • Motivation
  • Resilience, Psychological
  • School Admission Criteria / statistics & numerical data*
  • Schools, Medical / statistics & numerical data*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • United Kingdom