Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 50 of 200

    1.

    The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

    Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Bassett LW, Rubin DL, Lee CH, Ikeda DM, Mendelson EB, Wilcox PA, Butler PF, D'Orsi CJ.

    J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Dec;6(12):851-60.PMID: 19945040 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    2.

    Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.

    Elmore JG, Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Rosenberg RD, Sickles EA, Buist DS.

    Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. Epub 2009 Oct 28.PMID: 19864507 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    3.

    When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.

    Miglioretti DL, Gard CC, Carney PA, Onega TL, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Elmore JG.

    Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):632-40. Epub 2009 Sep 29.PMID: 19789234 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    4.

    Decreased accuracy in interpretation of community-based screening mammography for women with multiple clinical risk factors.

    Cook AJ, Elmore JG, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Bowles EJ, Cutter GR, Carney PA.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep 8. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 19744825 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    5.

    Variability of interpretive accuracy among diagnostic mammography facilities.

    Jackson SL, Taplin SH, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Carney PA, Geller B, Berns EA, Cutter GR, Elmore JG.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 3;101(11):814-27. Epub 2009 May 26.PMID: 19470953 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

    Venkatesan A, Chu P, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Smith-Bindman R.

    Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):648-57. Epub 2009 Jan 21.PMID: 19164116 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Mammography facility characteristics associated with interpretive accuracy of screening mammography.

    Taplin S, Abraham L, Barlow WE, Fenton JJ, Berns EA, Carney PA, Cutter GR, Sickles EA, Carl D, Elmore JG.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Jun 18;100(12):876-87. Epub 2008 Jun 10.PMID: 18544742 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.

    Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1200-8.PMID: 18430832 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Auditing your breast imaging practice: an evidence-based approach.

    Sickles EA.

    Semin Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;42(4):211-7. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 17919523 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    The probably benign assessment.

    Leung JW, Sickles EA.

    Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):773-89, vi. Review.PMID: 17888768 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    The spectrum of breast asymmetries: imaging features, work-up, management.

    Sickles EA.

    Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):765-71, v.PMID: 17888767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?

    Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):87-93.PMID: 17581897 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    American College Of Radiology/Society of Breast Imaging curriculum for resident and fellow education in breast imaging.

    Sickles EA, Philpotts LE, Parkinson BT, Monticciolo DL, Lvoff NM, Ikeda DM, High M, Farria D, Carlson RA, Burnside ES, Bassett LW, Allen JD, Monsees B, Lee CH, Evans P, Dershaw DD, Brenner RJ.

    J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Nov;3(11):879-84.PMID: 17412188 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    The place of medical image perception in 21st-century health care.

    Beam CA, Krupinski EA, Kundel HL, Sickles EA, Wagner RF.

    J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Jun;3(6):409-12. Review.PMID: 17412095 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.

    Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA, Abraham L, Sickles EA, D'Orsi C, Berns EA, Cutter G, Hendrick RE, Barlow WE, Elmore JG.

    N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 5;356(14):1399-409.PMID: 17409321 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.

    Carney PA, Yi JP, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Aiello EJ, Gerrity MS, Reisch L, Berns EA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.

    J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):234-41.PMID: 17356992 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Developing asymmetry identified on mammography: correlation with imaging outcome and pathologic findings.

    Leung JW, Sickles EA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Mar;188(3):667-75.PMID: 17312052 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.

    Carney PA, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Yabroff KR, Sickles EA, Buist DS, Kasales CJ, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Dignan MB, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):385-92.PMID: 17242246 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.

    Sickles EA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):301-3. No abstract available. PMID: 17242234 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Improving the concordance of mammography assessment and management recommendations.

    Geller BM, Ichikawa LE, Buist DS, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Dignan M, Kerlikowske K, Yabroff KR, Barlow W, Rosenberg RD; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

    Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):67-75.PMID: 16990672 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    21.

    Performance benchmarks for screening mammography.

    Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, Sickles EA, Lehman CD, Geller BM, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Buist DS, Weaver DL, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R.

    Radiology. 2006 Oct;241(1):55-66.PMID: 16990671 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    22.

    Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers.

    Fenton JJ, Egger J, Carney PA, Cutter G, D'Orsi C, Sickles EA, Fosse J, Abraham L, Taplin SH, Barlow W, Hendrick RE, Elmore JG.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul;187(1):42-6.PMID: 16794153 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    23.

    Correlation of radiologist rank as a measure of skill in screening and diagnostic interpretation of mammograms.

    Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2006 Feb;238(2):446-53.PMID: 16436811 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    24.

    Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.

    Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, Geller BM, Leung JW, Rosenberg RD, Smith-Bindman R, Yankaskas BC.

    Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):775-90.PMID: 15914475 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    25.

    Mammography with breast cushions.

    Dibble SL, Israel J, Nussey B, Sayre JW, Brenner RJ, Sickles EA.

    Womens Health Issues. 2005 Mar-Apr;15(2):55-63.PMID: 15767195 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    26.

    Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.

    Smith-Bindman R, Chu P, Miglioretti DL, Quale C, Rosenberg RD, Cutter G, Geller B, Bacchetti P, Sickles EA, Kerlikowske K.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Mar 2;97(5):358-67.PMID: 15741572 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    27.

    Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

    Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham LA, Lehman CD, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Voeks JH, Geller BM, Carney PA, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):684-92.PMID: 15734926 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    28.

    Preoperative embolization of vascular phyllodes tumor of the breast.

    Leung JW, Gotway MB, Sickles EA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Mar;184(3 Suppl):S115-7. No abstract available. PMID: 15727999 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    29.

    Rationale for annual screening mammography for women ages 40-49 years.

    Feig SA, Kopans DB, Sickles EA, Jackson VP, Monsees B.

    Breast Dis. 1998 Aug;10(3-4):13-21.PMID: 15687560 [PubMed]Related articles

    30.

    Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?

    Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):850-6. Epub 2004 Oct 14.PMID: 15486217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    31.

    Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

    Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Aug 18;96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. No abstract available. PMID: 15316065 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    32.

    Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.

    Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ.

    Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):811-9. Epub 2004 Feb 5.PMID: 14764891 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    33.

    A probabilistic expert system that provides automated mammographic-histologic correlation: initial experience.

    Burnside ES, Rubin DL, Shachter RD, Sohlich RE, Sickles EA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Feb;182(2):481-8.PMID: 14736686 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    34.

    Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography.

    Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA, Weinstein SP.

    Radiology. 2003 Nov;229(2):534-40.PMID: 14595152 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    35.

    Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

    Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K.

    JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. Erratum in: JAMA. 2004 Feb 18;291(7):824. PMID: 14570948 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    36.

    Short-interval follow-up mammography: are we doing the right thing?

    Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Sickles EA.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Mar 19;95(6):418-9. No abstract available. PMID: 12644528 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    37.

    Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.

    Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90.PMID: 12591984 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    38.

    Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening.

    Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Brenner RJ, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2003 Feb;226(2):494-503.PMID: 12563145 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    39.

    Factors affecting radiologist inconsistency in screening mammography.

    Beam CA, Conant EF, Sickles EA.

    Acad Radiol. 2002 May;9(5):531-40.PMID: 12458879 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    40.

    Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography.

    Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1173-7.PMID: 12388494 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    41.

    Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.

    Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE.

    Radiology. 2002 Sep;224(3):861-9.PMID: 12202726 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    42.

    Interpreting data from audits when screening and diagnostic mammography outcomes are combined.

    Sohlich RE, Sickles EA, Burnside ES, Dee KE.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):681-6.PMID: 11856698 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    43.

    Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS to report on the mammographic evaluation of women with signs and symptoms of breast disease.

    Geller BM, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Ernster VL, Yankaskas BC, Sickles EA, Carney PA, Dignan MB, Rosenberg RD, Urban N, Zheng Y, Taplin SH.

    Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):536-42.PMID: 11818625 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    44.

    Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography.

    Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K, Ernster VL, Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Carney PA, Geller BM, Urban N, Dignan MB, Barlow WE, Ballard-Barbash R, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):529-35.PMID: 11818624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    45.

    Movement of a biopsy-site marker clip after completion of stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: case report.

    Burnside ES, Sohlich RE, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2001 Nov;221(2):504-7.PMID: 11687696 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    46.

    Mammographic screening: international perspective.

    Burhenne LJ, Smith RA, Tabar L, Dean PB, Perry N, Sickles EA.

    Semin Roentgenol. 2001 Jul;36(3):187-94. Review.PMID: 11475065 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    47.

    International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions.

    Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WG Jr, Boné B, Casselman J, Coulthard A, Fischer U, Müller-Schimpfle M, Oellinger H, Patt R, Teubner J, Friedrich M, Newstead G, Holland R, Schauer A, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Waisman J, Wernecke KD.

    Eur Radiol. 2001;11(4):531-46.PMID: 11354744 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    48.

    Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.

    Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2001 Apr;219(1):192-202.PMID: 11274556 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    49.

    Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently.

    Dee KE, Sickles EA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):729-33.PMID: 11222214 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    50.

    Breast imaging: from 1965 to the present.

    Sickles EA.

    Radiology. 2000 Apr;215(1):1-16.PMID: 10751459 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data

    Search details

    » See more...