Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 7

    1.

    A simple model to predict the sensitivity to change of visual acuity measurements.

    Cousens SN, Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Laidlaw DA.

    Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;81(9):673-7.PMID: 15365386 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    The effect of optical defocus on the test-retest variability of visual acuity measurements.

    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Cousens SN.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;45(4):1076-9.PMID: 15037571 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.

    Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):754-8.PMID: 12928690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.

    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6.PMID: 12928680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements?

    Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Aug;44(8):3278-81.PMID: 12882770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.

    Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):432-6.PMID: 11264133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data

    Search details

    » See more...