Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
1967 1
1968 7
1969 9
1970 40
1971 88
1972 123
1973 203
1974 188
1975 257
1976 183
1977 187
1978 220
1979 180
1980 148
1981 159
1982 157
1983 163
1984 139
1985 183
1986 181
1987 205
1988 294
1989 322
1990 337
1991 335
1992 387
1993 415
1994 409
1995 426
1996 447
1997 531
1998 624
1999 686
2000 682
2001 767
2002 1119
2003 878
2004 913
2005 971
2006 1186
2007 1207
2008 1468
2009 1498
2010 1799
2011 1880
2012 2100
2013 2484
2014 2753
2015 3121
2016 3453
2017 4303
2018 4770
2019 5663
2020 6775
2021 7927
2022 8888
2023 11284
2024 6081

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

83,900 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Did you mean peer review and peer peer reviewed (70,732 results)?
No evidence of important difference in summary treatment effects between COVID-19 preprints and peer-reviewed publications: a meta-epidemiological study.
Davidson M, Evrenoglou T, Graña C, Chaimani A, Boutron I. Davidson M, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;162:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Aug 25. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 37634703 Free article. Review.
We aimed to evaluate whether summary treatment effect estimates differ between preprint and peer-reviewed journal trials. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A meta-epidemiological study. Data were derived from the COVID-NMA living systematic review (covid-nma.com) up …
We aimed to evaluate whether summary treatment effect estimates differ between preprint and peer-reviewed journal trials. STUD …
Peer reviewed journal articles.
Gyles C. Gyles C. Can Vet J. 2018 Feb;59(2):113-115. Can Vet J. 2018. PMID: 29386669 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Peer-reviewed process: is everything valid?
Piñero DP. Piñero DP. J Optom. 2022 Jul-Sep;15(3):189-190. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2022.06.001. J Optom. 2022. PMID: 35728878 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
The evolution of peer-reviewed papers.
Rönnegård L. Rönnegård L. J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Mar;136(2):77-78. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12385. J Anim Breed Genet. 2019. PMID: 30773713 No abstract available.
Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review.
Rogers W, Robertson MP, Ballantyne A, Blakely B, Catsanos R, Clay-Williams R, Fiatarone Singh M. Rogers W, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024473. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30723071 Free PMC article. Review.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate whether papers reporting research on Chinese transplant recipients comply with international professional standards aimed at excluding publication of research that: (1) involves any biological material from executed prison …
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to investigate whether papers reporting research on Chinese transplant recipients comply with int …
83,900 results
You have reached the last available page of results. Please see the User Guide for more information.