Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 421

    1.

    Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.

    Salzmann P, Kerlikowske K, Phillips K.

    Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 1;127(11):955-65. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 1998 May 15;128(10):878. PMID: 9412300 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness.

    Kerlikowske K, Salzmann P, Phillips KA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR.

    JAMA. 1999 Dec 8;282(22):2156-63.PMID: 10591338 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.

    Wong IO, Kuntz KM, Cowling BJ, Lam CL, Leung GM.

    Cancer. 2007 Aug 15;110(4):885-95.PMID: 17607668 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status.

    Mandelblatt JS, Schechter CB, Yabroff KR, Lawrence W, Dignam J, Extermann M, Fox S, Orosz G, Silliman R, Cullen J, Balducci L; Breast Cancer in Older Women Research Consortium.

    J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jun;20(6):487-96.PMID: 15987322 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies.

    Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ.

    JAMA. 1995 Sep 20;274(11):881-4. Erratum in: JAMA 1996 Jan 10;275(2):112. PMID: 7674501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.

    Wong G, Howard K, Chapman JR, Craig JC.

    Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Nov;52(5):916-29. Epub 2008 Sep 11.PMID: 18789566 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.

    Neeser K, Szucs T, Bulliard JL, Bachmann G, Schramm W.

    Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):42-53.PMID: 17261115 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.

    Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. Epub 2008 Sep 9.PMID: 18780864 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40-49 years.

    Ohnuki K, Kuriyama S, Shoji N, Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Ohuchi N.

    Cancer Sci. 2006 Nov;97(11):1242-7. Epub 2006 Aug 17.PMID: 16918992 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.

    Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Smith MA, Robinson SM, Fryback DG.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 7;98(11):774-82.PMID: 16757702 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review.

    Barratt AL, Les Irwig M, Glasziou PP, Salkeld GP, Houssami N.

    Med J Aust. 2002 Mar 18;176(6):266-71. Review.PMID: 11999259 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of mammography and clinical breast examination strategies: a comparison with current guidelines.

    Ahern CH, Shen Y.

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):718-25. Epub 2009 Mar 3.PMID: 19258473 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Mammography screening for older women with and without cognitive impairment.

    Messecar DC.

    J Gerontol Nurs. 2000 Apr;26(4):14-24; quiz 52-3.PMID: 11272962 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.

    Moore SG, Shenoy PJ, Fanucchi L, Tumeh JW, Flowers CR.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan 13;9:9.PMID: 19144138 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Screening mammography in women aged 40-49 years: analysis of cost-effectiveness.

    Rosenquist CJ, Lindfors KK.

    Radiology. 1994 Jun;191(3):647-50.PMID: 8184041 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.

    Frazier AL, Colditz GA, Fuchs CS, Kuntz KM.

    JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1954-61.PMID: 11035892 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.

    Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE, Garber AM.

    JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84.PMID: 16720823 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening.

    Tosteson AN, Stout NK, Fryback DG, Acharyya S, Herman BA, Hannah LG, Pisano ED; DMIST Investigators.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 1;148(1):1-10.PMID: 18166758 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

    Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S, Hoerger T, Siu AL, Atkins D, Klein J, Helfand M; Cost Work Group of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

    Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):835-42. Review.PMID: 14623621 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Computer-aided detection of breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness study.

    Lindfors KK, McGahan MC, Rosenquist CJ, Hurlock GS.

    Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):710-7. Epub 2006 Mar 28. Erratum in: Radiology. 2007 Jan;242(1):320. PMID: 16569787 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data