Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 90

    1.

    Selecting and appraising studies for a systematic review.

    Meade MO, Richardson WS.

    Ann Intern Med. 1997 Oct 1;127(7):531-7.PMID: 9313021 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

    Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.PMID: 16487455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.

    Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J.

    Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):529-46. Epub 2009 Feb 23. Review.PMID: 19233357 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    [Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of randomised trials in nephrology: theory and practice for interpreting level I evidence]

    Strippoli GF, Manno C, Schena FP.

    G Ital Nefrol. 2003 Nov-Dec;20(6):615-24. Review. Italian. PMID: 14732915 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews.

    Hayden JA, Côté P, Bombardier C.

    Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 21;144(6):427-37.PMID: 16549855 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

    Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.PMID: 11532239 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

    Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

    Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.PMID: 15361314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.

    Dixon E, Hameed M, Sutherland F, Cook DJ, Doig C.

    Ann Surg. 2005 Mar;241(3):450-9.PMID: 15729067 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Conducting a systematic review.

    Jones T, Evans D.

    Aust Crit Care. 2000 May;13(2):66-71.PMID: 11235454 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

    Tricco AC, Tetzlaff J, Sampson M, Fergusson D, Cogo E, Horsley T, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):422-34. Review.PMID: 18394534 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

    Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ.

    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):43-54.PMID: 12897595 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Examining the evidence in anesthesia literature: a critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

    Choi PT, Halpern SH, Malik N, Jadad AR, Tramèr MR, Walder B.

    Anesth Analg. 2001 Mar;92(3):700-9.PMID: 11226105 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

    Forbes C, Shirran L, Bagnall AM, Duffy S, ter Riet G.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. Review.PMID: 11701100 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease: a rapid and systematic review.

    Clegg A, Bryant J, Nicholson T, McIntyre L, De Broe S, Gerard K, Waugh N.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(1):1-137. Review.PMID: 11262420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.

    Flynn MA, McNeil DA, Maloff B, Mutasingwa D, Wu M, Ford C, Tough SC.

    Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. Review.PMID: 16371076 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of orlistat in the management of obesity.

    O'Meara S, Riemsma R, Shirran L, Mather L, ter Riet G.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(18):1-81. Review.PMID: 11399238 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in children and adolescents.

    Hiiri A, Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD003067. Review.PMID: 17054158 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

    Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

    Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.PMID: 14499048 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]

    Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

    Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian. PMID: 16529350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    [The practice of systematic reviews. II. Searching and selection of studies]

    Assendelft WJ, van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM.

    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):656-61. Review. Dutch. PMID: 10321296 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data