Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 113

    1.

    Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled?

    Fleming TR, DeMets DL.

    Ann Intern Med. 1996 Oct 1;125(7):605-13. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 8815760 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    "Sufficient life expectancy": an amazing inclusion criterion in cancer phase II-III trials.

    Penel N, Clisant S, Lefebvre JL, Adenis A.

    J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 10;27(26):e105. Epub 2009 Aug 10. No abstract available. PMID: 19667257 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Interim analyses in clinical trials: why do we plan them?

    Fossâ SD, Skovlund E.

    J Clin Oncol. 2000 Dec 15;18(24):4007-8. No abstract available. PMID: 11118460 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    [Surrogate endpoints]

    Hill C.

    Bull Cancer. 1999 Jul-Aug;86(7-8):622-4. French. PMID: 10477379 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Randomized, controlled clinical trials in sepsis: has methodological quality improved over time?

    Graf J, Doig GS, Cook DJ, Vincent JL, Sibbald WJ.

    Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb;30(2):461-72. Review.PMID: 11889331 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Evaluation and recommendations on good clinical laboratory practice guidelines for phase I-III clinical trials.

    Sarzotti-Kelsoe M, Cox J, Cleland N, Denny T, Hural J, Needham L, Ozaki D, Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Stevens G, Stiles T, Tarragona-Fiol T, Simkins A.

    PLoS Med. 2009 May 26;6(5):e1000067. Epub 2009 May 5. No abstract available. PMID: 19536325 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies]

    Penel N, Saleron J, Lansiaux A, Clisant S, Adenis A, Fournier C, Duhamel A, Bonneterre J.

    Bull Cancer. 2008 Feb;95(2):185-90. Review. French. PMID: 18304903 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    New proposed guidelines for clinical trials in liver cancer.

    Lang L.

    Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):7. Epub 2008 Jun 11. No abstract available. PMID: 18554512 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    [Can the correct dose be predicted by phase III?]

    Dahan R, Jaillon P, Lehner JP.

    Therapie. 1993 Jul-Aug;48(4):297-301. French. No abstract available. PMID: 7907438 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.

    Tuma RS.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Feb 6;100(3):164-6. Epub 2008 Jan 29. No abstract available. PMID: 18230788 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Use of predictive probabilities in phase II and phase III clinical trials.

    Johns D, Andersen JS.

    J Biopharm Stat. 1999 Mar;9(1):67-79.PMID: 10091910 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Novel endpoints and design of early clinical trials.

    Parulekar WR, Eisenhauer EA.

    Ann Oncol. 2002;13 Suppl 4:139-43. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 12401680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    An overview of clinical trials.

    Rich K.

    J Vasc Nurs. 2004 Mar;22(1):32-4. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 14981501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Clinical trials.

    Farrington P, Miller E.

    Methods Mol Med. 2003;87:335-52. No abstract available. PMID: 12958466 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Quality of life in clinical cancer trials: experience and perspective of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

    Kiebert GM, Kaasa S.

    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996;(20):91-5. No abstract available. PMID: 8750477 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Accelerated drug development through combined phase 2/3 clinical trial design.

    Cunningham ET Jr, da Silva L, Harrison EM, Modi MW, O'Shaughnessy D, Guyer DR.

    Arch Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;122(7):1043-4. No abstract available. PMID: 15249371 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Clinical trials referral resource. Current phase II and phase III clinical trials in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

    Mooney MM, Schoenfeldt M.

    Oncology (Williston Park). 2004 Oct;18(11):1396, 1401, 1404 passim. No abstract available. PMID: 15609469 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    The phase II/III transition. Toward the proof of efficacy in cancer clinical trials.

    Fazzari M, Heller G, Scher HI.

    Control Clin Trials. 2000 Aug;21(4):360-8.PMID: 10913810 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Standardization, more funds on horizon for clinical trials.

    McNeil C.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Apr 20;97(8):555-7. No abstract available. PMID: 15840874 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?

    Berger VW.

    Stat Med. 2004 May 30;23(10):1571-8.PMID: 15122737 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data