My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 146

    1.

    Discordance between meta-analyses and large-scale randomized, controlled trials. Examples from the management of acute myocardial infarction.

    Borzak S, Ridker PM.

    Ann Intern Med. 1995 Dec 1;123(11):873-7.PMID: 7486471 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: larger studies may be more reliable.

    Flather MD, Farkouh ME, Pogue JM, Yusuf S.

    Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):568-79; discussion 661-6.PMID: 9408719 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    The importance of effect mechanism in the design and interpretation of clinical trials: the role of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Woods KL, Abrams K.

    Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2002 Jan-Feb;44(4):267-74.PMID: 12007082 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for myocardial infarction.

    Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC.

    N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 23;327(4):248-54.PMID: 1614465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Mega-trials and management of acute myocardial infarction.

    Woods KL.

    Lancet. 1995 Sep 2;346(8975):611-4. Review.PMID: 7651008 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    The interpretation of systematic reviews with meta-analyses: an objective or subjective process?

    Shrier I, Boivin JF, Platt RW, Steele RJ, Brophy JM, Carnevale F, Eisenberg MJ, Furlan A, Kakuma R, Macdonald ME, Pilote L, Rossignol M.

    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008 May 21;8:19.PMID: 18495019 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

    Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC.

    JAMA. 1992 Jul 8;268(2):240-8.PMID: 1535110 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Safety outcomes in meta-analyses of phase 2 vs phase 3 randomized trials: Intracranial hemorrhage in trials of bolus thrombolytic therapy.

    Eikelboom JW, Mehta SR, Pogue J, Yusuf S.

    JAMA. 2001 Jan 24-31;285(4):444-50.PMID: 11242429 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Adjunctive drug therapy of acute myocardial infarction--evidence from clinical trials.

    Hennekens CH, Albert CM, Godfried SL, Gaziano JM, Buring JE.

    N Engl J Med. 1996 Nov 28;335(22):1660-7. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 8929364 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Efficacy of intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction in reducing arrhythmias and mortality. Meta-analysis of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

    Horner SM.

    Circulation. 1992 Sep;86(3):774-9.PMID: 1387591 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Being sceptical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction.

    Higgins JP, Spiegelhalter DJ.

    Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb;31(1):96-104.PMID: 11914302 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    The role of meta-analyses in assessing cancer treatments.

    Sylvester R, Collette L, Duchateau L.

    Eur J Cancer. 2000 Jul;36(11):1351-8. Review.PMID: 10899647 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    [Meta-analyses, magnesium and acute myocardial infarction]

    Landmark K, Reikvam A.

    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Jan 10;121(1):97-8. Norwegian. No abstract available. PMID: 12013626 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Intravenous magnesium for acute myocardial infarction.

    Li J, Zhang Q, Zhang M, Egger M.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD002755. Review.PMID: 17443517 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.

    LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F.

    N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 21;337(8):536-42.PMID: 9262498 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials in oncology.

    Pignon JP, Hill C.

    Lancet Oncol. 2001 Aug;2(8):475-82. Review.PMID: 11905723 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Herbal and dietary therapies for primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea.

    Proctor ML, Murphy PA.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD002124. Review.PMID: 11687013 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    The rational use of therapeutic drugs in the 21st century. Important lessons from cumulative meta-analyses of randomized control trials.

    Lau J, Chalmers TC.

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1995 Summer;11(3):509-22.PMID: 7591550 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Reporting of gender-related information in clinical trials of drug therapy for myocardial infarction.

    Rochon PA, Clark JP, Binns MA, Patel V, Gurwitz JH.

    CMAJ. 1998 Aug 25;159(4):321-7. Erratum in: CMAJ 1998 Sep 22;159(6):650. PMID: 9732709 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Meta-analyses and overviews of randomised trials.

    Richards SM.

    Blood Rev. 1995 Jun;9(2):85-91. Review.PMID: 7580394 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity