Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 100

    1.

    The medical review article: state of the science.

    Mulrow CD.

    Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485-8.PMID: 3813259 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    Do authors of review articles use systematic methods to identify, assess and synthesize information?

    Bramwell VH, Williams CJ.

    Ann Oncol. 1997 Dec;8(12):1185-95. Review.PMID: 9496383 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.

    Smith AF.

    Can J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;44(4):405-9.PMID: 9104524 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

    Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.

    Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26.PMID: 11679863 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?

    McAlister FA, Clark HD, van Walraven C, Straus SE, Lawson FM, Moher D, Mulrow CD.

    Ann Intern Med. 1999 Dec 21;131(12):947-51.PMID: 10610646 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease: a rapid and systematic review.

    Clegg A, Bryant J, Nicholson T, McIntyre L, De Broe S, Gerard K, Waugh N.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(1):1-137. Review.PMID: 11262420 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

    Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.PMID: 16487455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Identification and assessment of ongoing trials in health technology assessment reviews.

    Song FJ, Fry-Smith A, Davenport C, Bayliss S, Adi Y, Wilson JS, Hyde C.

    Health Technol Assess. 2004 Nov;8(44):iii, 1-87. Review.PMID: 15525479 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

    Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

    Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.PMID: 14499048 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews.

    Mallen C, Peat G, Croft P.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):765-9. Epub 2006 May 30. Review.PMID: 16828667 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

    Forbes C, Shirran L, Bagnall AM, Duffy S, ter Riet G.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. Review.PMID: 11701100 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.

    Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D, Bond GR, Huxley P, Tyrer P.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. Review.PMID: 11532238 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.

    Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I.

    J R Soc Med. 2007 Apr;100(4):187-90.PMID: 17404342 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    [Comparative analysis of articles published by Spanish authors (1993-1997) in biomedical journals with high impact factor]

    Trilla A, Amymerich M, Giol M, Carné X, Asenjo MA, Rodés J.

    Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Apr 29;114(16):609-13. Spanish. PMID: 10846685 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.

    Oxman AD, Guyatt GH.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1271-8.PMID: 1834807 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    The management of established postherpetic neuralgia: a comparison of the quality and content of traditional vs. systematic reviews.

    Ladhani S, Williams HC.

    Br J Dermatol. 1998 Jul;139(1):66-72.PMID: 9764150 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ.

    Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28. Review.PMID: 16147767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.

    Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, Klassen TP, Tugwell P, Moher M, Moher D.

    JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):278-80.PMID: 9676681 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs.

    Lohr KN.

    Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Feb;16(1):9-18.PMID: 15020556 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    An analysis of review articles published in primary care journals.

    Silagy CA.

    Fam Pract. 1993 Sep;10(3):337-41.PMID: 8282163 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data