Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Generate a file for use with external citation management software.
Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures.
Bastiaansen JW, Coster A, Calus MP, van Arendonk JA, Bovenhuis H.
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Jan 24;44:3.
Related citations
The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.
Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JH.
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Feb 9;44:4.
A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW.
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:56.
Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. Review. Erratum in: J Dairy Sci. 2009 Mar;92(3):1313.
Marker assisted selection for the improvement of two antagonistic traits under mixed inheritance.
Verrier E.
Genet Sel Evol. 2001 Jan-Feb;33(1):17-38.
Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Styrene.
National Toxicology Program.
Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2008 Sep;(8-5978):i-398.
Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde.
Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010 Jan;(10-5981):i-512.
Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME.
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Nov 24;41:51.
Genomic selection for marker-assisted improvement in line crosses.
Piyasatian N, Fernando RL, Dekkers JC.
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Sep;115(5):665-74. Epub 2007 Aug 4.
Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MP.
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jan;95(1):389-400.
Long-term impacts of genome-enabled selection.
Long N, Gianola D, Rosa GJ, Weigel KA.
J Appl Genet. 2011 Nov;52(4):467-80. doi: 10.1007/s13353-011-0053-1. Epub 2011 May 17.
Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM, Sonesson AK, Meuwissen TH.
J Anim Sci. 2011 Mar;89(3):630-8. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
[Genomic selection and its application].
Li HD, Bao ZM, Sun XW.
Yi Chuan. 2011 Dec;33(12):1308-16. Review. Chinese.
Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding.
Hayes B, Goddard M.
Genome. 2010 Nov;53(11):876-83.
Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: a Barley case study.
Zhong S, Dekkers JC, Fernando RL, Jannink JL.
Genetics. 2009 May;182(1):355-64. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
Pryce JE, Gredler B, Bolormaa S, Bowman PJ, Egger-Danner C, Fuerst C, Emmerling R, Sölkner J, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 May;94(5):2625-30.
Sensitivity of methods for estimating breeding values using genetic markers to the number of QTL and distribution of QTL variance.
Coster A, Bastiaansen JW, Calus MP, van Arendonk JA, Bovenhuis H.
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Mar 22;42:9.
Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JC.
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jun 21;43:23.
Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs.
Sonesson AK, Meuwissen TH.
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jun 30;41:37.
Genetic response from marker assisted selection in an outbred population for differing marker bracket sizes and with two identified quantitative trait loci.
Spelman R, Bovenhuis H.
Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):1389-96.
Filters: Manage Filters
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on