Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 99

    1.

    Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice.

    Costa ML, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Milanez HM, Gülmezoglu MA.

    Reprod Health. 2010 Jun 26;7:13.

    PMID:
    20579388
    [PubMed - in process]
    Free PMC Article
    2.

    Contribution of select maternal groups to temporal trends in rates of caesarean section.

    Allen VM, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM.

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jul;32(7):633-41.

    PMID:
    20707951
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    3.

    WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections.

    Betrán AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, Widmer M, Carroli G, Torloni MR, Langer A, Narváez A, Velasco A, Faúndes A, Acosta A, Valladares E, Romero M, Zavaleta N, Reynoso S, Bataglia V.

    Reprod Health. 2009 Oct 29;6:18.

    PMID:
    19874598
    [PubMed]
    Free PMC Article
    4.

    Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde.

    National Toxicology Program.

    Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010 Jan;(10-5981):i-512.

    PMID:
    20737003
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    5.

    Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997-2006.

    Howell S, Johnston T, Macleod SL.

    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):606-11.

    PMID:
    20070708
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    6.

    Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Styrene.

    National Toxicology Program.

    Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2008 Sep;(8-5978):i-398.

    PMID:
    20737009
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    7.

    Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.

    Kayani SI, Alfirevic Z.

    BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):451-5. Erratum in: BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):528.

    PMID:
    15777443
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    8.

    Outcomes of elective labour induction and elective caesarean section in low-risk pregnancies between 37 and 41 weeks' gestation.

    Dunne C, Da Silva O, Schmidt G, Natale R.

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Dec;31(12):1124-30.

    PMID:
    20085677
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    9.

    Limiting the caesarean section rate in low risk pregnancies is key to lowering the trend of increased abdominal deliveries: an observational study.

    Delbaere I, Cammu H, Martens E, Tency I, Martens G, Temmerman M.

    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Jan 9;12:3.

    PMID:
    22230339
    [PubMed - in process]
    Free PMC Article
    10.

    Does routine induction of labour at 41 weeks really reduce the rate of caesarean section compared with expectant management?

    Pavicic H, Hamelin K, Menticoglou SM.

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jul;31(7):621-6.

    PMID:
    19761635
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    11.

    Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region.

    Paterson CM, Saunders NJ.

    BMJ. 1991 Oct 5;303(6806):818-21.

    PMID:
    1932972
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    12.

    A new way of looking at Caesarean section births.

    McCarthy FP, Rigg L, Cady L, Cullinane F.

    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;47(4):316-20.

    PMID:
    17627688
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    13.

    -Anesthesia and analgesia practice patterns in French obstetrical patients-.

    Palot M, Chalé JJ, Colladon B, Levy G, Maria B, Papiernik E, Souteyrand P, Naiditch M.

    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17(3):210-9. French.

    PMID:
    9750732
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    14.

    Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section.

    Locatelli A, Regalia AL, Ghidini A, Ciriello E, Biffi A, Pezzullo JC.

    BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1394-9.

    PMID:
    15663125
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    15.

    Do group practices have lower caesarean rates than solo practice obstetric clinics? Evidence from Taiwan.

    Xirasagar S, Lin HC, Liu TC.

    Health Policy Plan. 2006 Jul;21(4):319-25.

    PMID:
    16790455
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article
    16.

    The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.

    Holmes P, Oppenheimer LW, Wen SW.

    BJOG. 2001 Nov;108(11):1120-4.

    PMID:
    11762649
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    17.

    Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

    Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, O'Herlihy C.

    Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;201(3):308.e1-8.

    PMID:
    19733283
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    18.

    Evaluation of Risk Factors and Effect of Physical Activity in Caesarean Section in Nulliparous Women.

    Karabulut A, Derbent AU, Yıldırım M, Simavli S, Turhan NO.

    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov 18. [Epub ahead of print]

    PMID:
    22097962
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    19.

    Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women.

    Brown HC, Paranjothy S, Dowswell T, Thomas J.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD004907. Review.

    PMID:
    18843671
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    20.

    Introducing routine trial of labour after caesarean section in a second level hospital setting.

    Fruscalzo A, Salmeri MG, Cendron A, Londero AP, Zanni G.

    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Dec 13. [Epub ahead of print]

    PMID:
    22097885
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

      Display Settings:

      Format
      Items per page
      Sort by

      Send to:

      Choose Destination

      Supplemental Content

      Find related data

      Recent activity

      Write to the Help Desk