Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Estimation of the applicability domain of kernel-based machine learning models for virtual screening.
Fechner N, Jahn A, Hinselmann G, Zell A.
J Cheminform. 2010 Mar 11;2(1):2.
Related citations
Molecule kernels: a descriptor- and alignment-free quantitative structure-activity relationship approach.
Mohr JA, Jain BJ, Obermayer K.
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Sep;48(9):1868-81. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
Rank order entropy: why one metric is not enough.
McLellan MR, Ryan MD, Breneman CM.
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Sep 26;51(9):2302-19. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
Kinase-Kernel Models: Accurate In silico Screening of 4 Million Compounds Across the Entire Human Kinome.
Martin E, Mukherjee P.
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Jan 23;52(1):156-70. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection.
Tetko IV, Sushko I, Pandey AK, Zhu H, Tropsha A, Papa E, Oberg T, Todeschini R, Fourches D, Varnek A.
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Sep;48(9):1733-46. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
Predictive QSAR modeling workflow, model applicability domains, and virtual screening.
Tropsha A, Golbraikh A.
Curr Pharm Des. 2007;13(34):3494-504. Review.
Estimating the domain of applicability for machine learning QSAR models: a study on aqueous solubility of drug discovery molecules.
Schroeter TS, Schwaighofer A, Mika S, Ter Laak A, Suelzle D, Ganzer U, Heinrich N, Müller KR.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007 Sep;21(9):485-98. Epub 2007 Jul 14.
Stochastic versus stepwise strategies for quantitative structure-activity relationship generation--how much effort may the mining for successful QSAR models take?
Horvath D, Bonachera F, Solov'ev V, Gaudin C, Varnek A.
J Chem Inf Model. 2007 May-Jun;47(3):927-39. Epub 2007 May 5.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2007 Dec;21(12):651-64. Epub 2007 Dec 1.
QSAR models for CXCR2 receptor antagonists based on the genetic algorithm for data preprocessing prior to application of the PLS linear regression method and design of the new compounds using in silico virtual screening.
Asadollahi T, Dadfarnia S, Shabani AM, Ghasemi JB, Sarkhosh M.
Molecules. 2011 Feb 25;16(3):1928-55.
Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.
Zhu H, Tropsha A, Fourches D, Varnek A, Papa E, Gramatica P, Oberg T, Dao P, Cherkasov A, Tetko IV.
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Apr;48(4):766-84. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
A novel automated lazy learning QSAR (ALL-QSAR) approach: method development, applications, and virtual screening of chemical databases using validated ALL-QSAR models.
Zhang S, Golbraikh A, Oloff S, Kohn H, Tropsha A.
J Chem Inf Model. 2006 Sep-Oct;46(5):1984-95.
A machine learning-based approach to prognostic analysis of thoracic transplantations.
Delen D, Oztekin A, Kong ZJ.
Artif Intell Med. 2010 May;49(1):33-42. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
Differentiation of AmpC beta-lactamase binders vs. decoys using classification kNN QSAR modeling and application of the QSAR classifier to virtual screening.
Hsieh JH, Wang XS, Teotico D, Golbraikh A, Tropsha A.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2008 Sep;22(9):593-609. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
Unified QSAR approach to antimicrobials. Part 3: first multi-tasking QSAR model for input-coded prediction, structural back-projection, and complex networks clustering of antiprotozoal compounds.
Prado-Prado FJ, González-Díaz H, de la Vega OM, Ubeira FM, Chou KC.
Bioorg Med Chem. 2008 Jun 1;16(11):5871-80. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Ligand-based virtual screening and in silico design of new antimalarial compounds using nonstochastic and stochastic total and atom-type quadratic maps.
Marrero-Ponce Y, Iyarreta-Veitía M, Montero-Torres A, Romero-Zaldivar C, Brandt CA, Avila PE, Kirchgatter K, Machado Y.
J Chem Inf Model. 2005 Jul-Aug;45(4):1082-100.
Trainable structure-activity relationship model for virtual screening of CYP3A4 inhibition.
Didziapetris R, Dapkunas J, Sazonovas A, Japertas P.
J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2010 Nov;24(11):891-906. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds.
Shen M, Béguin C, Golbraikh A, Stables JP, Kohn H, Tropsha A.
J Med Chem. 2004 Apr 22;47(9):2356-64.
Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.
Tong W, Xie Q, Hong H, Shi L, Fang H, Perkins R.
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Aug;112(12):1249-54.
In silico binary classification QSAR models based on 4D-fingerprints and MOE descriptors for prediction of hERG blockage.
Su BH, Shen MY, Esposito EX, Hopfinger AJ, Tseng YJ.
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Jul 26;50(7):1304-18.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on