Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 108

    1.

    Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

    Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Fernando RL.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:55.

    PMID:
    20043827
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    2.

    Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population.

    Su G, Guldbrandtsen B, Gregersen VR, Lund MS.

    J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1175-83.

    PMID:
    20172238
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    3.

    Genomic breeding value estimation using genetic markers, inferred ancestral haplotypes, and the genomic relationship matrix.

    de Roos AP, Schrooten C, Druet T.

    J Dairy Sci. 2011 Sep;94(9):4708-14.

    PMID:
    21854945
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    4.

    Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.

    Kizilkaya K, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ.

    J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):544-51. Epub 2009 Oct 9.

    PMID:
    19820059
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article
    5.

    A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.

    Moser G, Tier B, Crump RE, Khatkar MS, Raadsma HW.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:56.

    PMID:
    20043835
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    6.

    Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.

    Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME.

    J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):433-43. Review. Erratum in: J Dairy Sci. 2009 Mar;92(3):1313.

    PMID:
    19164653
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    7.

    Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs.

    Ostersen T, Christensen OF, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Su G, Madsen P.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Nov 9;43:38.

    PMID:
    22070746
    [PubMed - in process]
    Free Article
    8.

    Graph-based data selection for the construction of genomic prediction models.

    Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G.

    Genetics. 2010 Aug;185(4):1463-75. Epub 2010 May 17.

    PMID:
    20479144
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    9.

    Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score.

    Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson DL, Legarra A, Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ.

    J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):743-52.

    PMID:
    20105546
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    10.

    The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.

    Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried FR, Lichtner P, Thaller G.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Feb 19;42:5.

    PMID:
    20170500
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    11.

    Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14.

    de Roos AP, Schrooten C, Mullaart E, Calus MP, Veerkamp RF.

    J Dairy Sci. 2007 Oct;90(10):4821-9.

    PMID:
    17881705
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    12.

    Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated' individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping.

    Meuwissen TH.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jun 11;41:35.

    PMID:
    19519896
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    13.

    Using eigenvalues as variance priors in the prediction of genomic breeding values by principal component analysis.

    Macciotta NP, Gaspa G, Steri R, Nicolazzi EL, Dimauro C, Pieramati C, Cappio-Borlino A.

    J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jun;93(6):2765-74.

    PMID:
    20494186
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    14.

    Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.

    Wolc A, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Dekkers JC.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jun 21;43:23.

    PMID:
    21693035
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    15.

    Final Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Formaldehyde.

    National Toxicology Program.

    Rep Carcinog Backgr Doc. 2010 Jan;(10-5981):i-512.

    PMID:
    20737003
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    16.

    Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations.

    de Roos AP, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME.

    Genetics. 2009 Dec;183(4):1545-53. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

    PMID:
    19822733
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    17.

    Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.

    Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Nov 24;41:51.

    PMID:
    19930712
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    18.

    Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

    Christensen OF, Lund MS.

    Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jan 27;42:2.

    PMID:
    20105297
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    19.

    Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes.

    Calus MP, Meuwissen TH, de Roos AP, Veerkamp RF.

    Genetics. 2008 Jan;178(1):553-61.

    PMID:
    18202394
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article
    20.

    Strategies for estimating genetic parameters in marker-assisted best linear unbiased predictor models in dairy cattle.

    Neuner S, Emmerling R, Thaller G, Götz KU.

    J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4344-54.

    PMID:
    18946140
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Display Settings:

      Format
      Items per page
      Sort by

      Send to:

      Choose Destination

      Supplemental Content

      Find related data

      Write to the Help Desk