Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs.
Sonesson AK, Meuwissen TH.
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jun 30;41:37.
Related citations
Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes.
Nielsen HM, Sonesson AK, Meuwissen TH.
J Anim Sci. 2011 Mar;89(3):630-8. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs.
Mulder HA, Bijma P.
J Anim Sci. 2005 Jan;83(1):49-61.
Within-family marker-assisted selection for aquaculture species.
Sonesson AK.
Genet Sel Evol. 2007 May-Jun;39(3):301-17. Epub 2007 Apr 14.
Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection.
Pryce JE, Goddard ME, Raadsma HW, Hayes BJ.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Nov;93(11):5455-66.
Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
de Roos AP, Schrooten C, Veerkamp RF, van Arendonk JA.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Mar;94(3):1559-67.
Broiler breeding strategies using indirect carcass measurements.
Zerehdaran S, Vereijken AL, van Arendonk JA, Bovenhuis H, van der Waaij EH.
Poult Sci. 2005 Aug;84(8):1214-21.
A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
Lillehammer M, Meuwissen TH, Sonesson AK.
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jan;94(1):493-500.
Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
J Anim Sci. 2011 Dec;89(12):3908-16. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
Optimizing pure line breeding strategies utilizing reproductive technologies.
Meuwissen TH.
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Sep;81 Suppl 2:47-54. Review.
Predicting rates of inbreeding for livestock improvement schemes.
Bijma P, Van Arendonk JA, Woolliams JA.
J Anim Sci. 2001 Apr;79(4):840-53.
Genomic selection using different marker types and densities.
Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH.
J Anim Sci. 2008 Oct;86(10):2447-54. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
Inbreeding in genome-wide selection.
Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2007 Dec;124(6):369-76.
Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
Genet Sel Evol. 2002 Jan-Feb;34(1):23-39.
A combination of walk-back and optimum contribution selection in fish: a simulation study.
Genet Sel Evol. 2005 Nov-Dec;37(6):587-99.
Effects of population structures and selection strategies on the purging of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations.
Wang J.
Genet Res. 2000 Aug;76(1):75-86.
Introgression of a major QTL from an inferior into a superior population using genomic selection.
Odegård J, Sonesson AK, Yazdi MH, Meuwissen TH.
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jul 27;41:38.
Confirmation and fine-mapping of a major QTL for resistance to infectious pancreatic necrosis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): population-level associations between markers and trait.
Moen T, Baranski M, Sonesson AK, Kjøglum S.
BMC Genomics. 2009 Aug 7;10:368.
Simulation study on the efficiencies of MOET nucleus breeding schemes applying marker assisted selection in dairy cattle.
Luo W, Wang Y, Zhang Y.
Sci China C Life Sci. 2009 Mar;52(3):296-306. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
Across-family marker-assisted selection using selective genotyping strategies in dairy cattle breeding schemes.
Ansari-Mahyari S, Sørensen AC, Lund MS, Thomsen H, Berg P.
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1628-39.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on