My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 94

    1.

    Discussing hidden bias in observational studies.

    Rosenbaum PR.

    Ann Intern Med. 1991 Dec 1;115(11):901-5.PMID: 1952480 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    Strengthening the case for disease management effectiveness: un-hiding the hidden bias.

    Linden A, Adams JL, Roberts N.

    J Eval Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;12(2):140-7. Review.PMID: 16579822 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Reduced sensitivity to hidden bias at upper quantiles in observational studies with dilated treatment effects.

    Rosenbaum PR.

    Biometrics. 1999 Jun;55(2):560-4.PMID: 11318214 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.

    Westhoff CL.

    Dialogues Contracept. 1995 Winter;4(5):5-6, 8.PMID: 12288680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

    Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

    Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.PMID: 15361314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

    Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

    Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.PMID: 14499048 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The effect of pregnancy on survival in women infected with HIV: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

    French R, Brocklehurst P.

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Aug;105(8):827-35.PMID: 9746374 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Assessing non-consent bias with parallel randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials.

    Marcus SM.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jul;50(7):823-8.PMID: 9253394 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]

    Van Breukelen GJ.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. Epub 2006 Jun 23. Erratum in: J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1334. PMID: 16895814 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Bias and causal associations in observational research.

    Grimes DA, Schulz KF.

    Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):248-52.PMID: 11812579 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Signed rank statistics for coherent predictions.

    Rosenbaum PR.

    Biometrics. 1997 Jun;53(2):556-66.PMID: 9192451 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Critical issues in longitudinal and observational studies: purpose, short versus long term, selection of study instruments, methods, outcomes, and biases.

    Wolfe F.

    J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):469-72.PMID: 9972989 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases.

    Greenland S.

    Int J Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;25(6):1107-16.PMID: 9027513 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach.

    Lu M.

    J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999 Jun 1;2(2):59-71.PMID: 11967410 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    15.

    Systematic reviews incorporating evidence from nonrandomized study designs: reasons for caution when estimating health effects.

    Reeves BC, van Binsbergen J, van Weel C.

    Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Aug;59 Suppl 1:S155-61.PMID: 16052184 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Does a dose-response relationship reduce sensitivity to hidden bias?

    Rosenbaum PR.

    Biostatistics. 2003 Jan;4(1):1-10.PMID: 12925326 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

    D'Agostino RB Jr.

    Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81.PMID: 9802183 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Sensitivity analysis for m-estimates, tests, and confidence intervals in matched observational studies.

    Rosenbaum PR.

    Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):456-64.PMID: 17688498 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.

    Dundar Y, Dodd S, Dickson R, Walley T, Haycox A, Williamson PR.

    Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. Review.PMID: 16487455 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.

    Arah OA, Chiba Y, Greenland S.

    Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;18(8):637-46.PMID: 18652982 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity