My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination
  • Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Results: 1 to 20 of 341

1.

Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?

Walbot V.

J Biol. 2009;8(3):24. Epub 2009 Mar 9.PMID: 19291274 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

2.

Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial.

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Carpenter J, Godlee F, Smith R.

BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):673. Epub 2004 Mar 2.PMID: 14996698 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

3.

What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Godlee F, Osorio L, Smith R.

J R Soc Med. 2008 Oct;101(10):507-14.PMID: 18840867 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

4.

The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews.

Levine AM, Heckman JD, Hensinger RN.

Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:689-97. Review.PMID: 15116659 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

5.

Effect of structured workshop training on subsequent performance of journal peer reviewers.

Callaham ML, Schriger DL.

Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Sep;40(3):323-8.PMID: 12192358 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

6.

Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.

Algase DL.

Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(4):219-21. No abstract available. PMID: 19093658 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

7.

A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54.PMID: 16177399 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

8.

Tips for manuscript reviewers.

Davidhizar R, Bechtel GA.

Nurse Author Ed. 2003 Summer;13(3):1-4.PMID: 12841086 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

10.

Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction.

Weber EJ, Katz PP, Waeckerle JF, Callaham ML.

JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2790-3.PMID: 12038913 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

11.

Manuscript revision strategies.

Conn VS.

West J Nurs Res. 2007 Nov;29(7):786-8. No abstract available. PMID: 17968004 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

12.

The effect of dedicated methodology and statistical review on published manuscript quality.

Schriger DL, Cooper RJ, Wears RL, Waeckerle JF.

Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Sep;40(3):334-7.PMID: 12192360 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

13.

Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.

Clarke SP.

Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Dec;38(4):5-9. No abstract available. PMID: 17342873 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

14.

Manuscript processing 101: problems and solutions.

DiBartola S, Hinchcliff K.

J Vet Intern Med. 1999 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-2. No abstract available. PMID: 10052055 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

15.

Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.

Brazeau GA, Dipiro JT, Fincham JE, Boucher BA, Tracy TS.

Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):69. No abstract available. PMID: 18698392 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

16.

Reviewers chosen by authors.

Tonks A.

BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):210. No abstract available. PMID: 7627022 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

17.

[Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection]

Clarke SP.

Perspect Infirm. 2006 Jan-Feb;3(3):35-9. French. No abstract available. PMID: 16480058 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

18.

Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

Cummings P, Rivara FP.

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jan;156(1):11-3. No abstract available. PMID: 11772184 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

19.

Standing up for the professionalism of peer reviewers of plastic surgery manuscripts.

Prado A, Andrades P.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Dec;124(6):2185-6. No abstract available. PMID: 19952679 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

20.

Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts.

Minion D, Sorial E, Endean E.

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):391-3. No abstract available. PMID: 17664118 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

Supplemental Content

Find related data

Recent activity

Write to the Help Desk