Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 88

    1.

    Trend tests for the evaluation of exposure-response relationships in epidemiological exposure studies.

    Hothorn LA, Vaeth M, Hothorn T.

    Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2009 Mar 6;6:1.

    PMID:
    19265556
    [PubMed]
    Free PMC Article
    2.

    A comparison of several methods to test for the existence of a monotonic dose-response relationship in clinical and epidemiological studies.

    Leuraud K, Benichou J.

    Stat Med. 2001 Nov 30;20(22):3335-51.

    PMID:
    11746322
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    3.

    An alternative test for trend in exposure-response analysis.

    Dosemeci M, Benichou J.

    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jan-Mar;8(1):9-15.

    PMID:
    9470101
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    4.

    Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.

    Ritter L, Solomon K, Sibley P, Hall K, Keen P, Mattu G, Linton B.

    J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2002 Jan 11;65(1):1-142. Review.

    PMID:
    11809004
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    5.

    An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).

    Gaylor DW, Aylward LL.

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;40(1):9-17.

    PMID:
    15265602
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    6.

    Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.

    Brookes ST, Whitley E, Peters TJ, Mulheran PA, Egger M, Davey Smith G.

    Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(33):1-56. Review.

    PMID:
    11701102
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article
    7.

    Dose-response and thresholds in mutagenicity studies: a statistical testing approach.

    Hothorn LA, Bretz F.

    Altern Lab Anim. 2003 Jun;31 Suppl 1:97-103.

    PMID:
    15595904
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    8.

    [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].

    Biggeri A, Bellini P, Terracini B; Italian MISA Group.

    Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71. Italian.

    PMID:
    11515188
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    9.

    Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.

    Brunekreef B, Beelen R, Hoek G, Schouten L, Bausch-Goldbohm S, Fischer P, Armstrong B, Hughes E, Jerrett M, van den Brandt P.

    Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar;(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.

    PMID:
    19554969
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    10.

    Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.

    Thybaud V, Aardema M, Clements J, Dearfield K, Galloway S, Hayashi M, Jacobson-Kram D, Kirkland D, MacGregor JT, Marzin D, Ohyama W, Schuler M, Suzuki H, Zeiger E; Expert Working Group on Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment in Relation to In Vitro Testing.

    Mutat Res. 2007 Feb 3;627(1):41-58. Epub 2006 Nov 27.

    PMID:
    17126066
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    11.

    The relationship between chronic and non-chronic trends.

    Niu K, Chen L, Liu Y, Jenich H.

    Popul Health Manag. 2009 Feb;12(1):31-8.

    PMID:
    19216677
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    12.

    Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.

    Shipp AM, Gentry PR, Lawrence G, Van Landingham C, Covington T, Clewell HJ, Gribben K, Crump K.

    Toxicol Ind Health. 2000 Nov;16(9-10):335-438. Review.

    PMID:
    11762928
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    13.

    Association between methylmercury exposure from fish consumption and child development at five and a half years of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study: an evaluation of nonlinear relationships.

    Axtell CD, Cox C, Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Choi AL, Cernichiari E, Sloane-Reeves J, Shamlaye CF, Clarkson TW.

    Environ Res. 2000 Oct;84(2):71-80.

    PMID:
    11068920
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    14.

    Epidemiological evidence on the carcinogenicity of silica: factors in scientific judgement.

    Soutar CA, Robertson A, Miller BG, Searl A, Bignon J.

    Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Jan;44(1):3-14. Review.

    PMID:
    10689755
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article
    15.
    16.

    Unconditional versions of several tests commonly used in the analysis of contingency tables.

    Freidlin B.

    Biometrics. 1999 Mar;55(1):264-7.

    PMID:
    11318165
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    17.

    Power comparisons for tests of trend in dose-response studies.

    Corcoran C, Mehta C, Senchaudhuri P.

    Stat Med. 2000 Nov 30;19(22):3037-50.

    PMID:
    11113941
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    18.

    A comparison of stratified and adjusted trend tests for binomial proportions.

    Leuraud K, Benichou J.

    Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):529-35.

    PMID:
    16025544
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    19.

    Update of potency factors for asbestos-related lung cancer and mesothelioma.

    Berman DW, Crump KS.

    Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38 Suppl 1:1-47.

    PMID:
    18671157
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    20.

    [Problems of the use of the trend test as a dose-response measurement in epidemiology].

    Pérez-Hoyos S, Benavides FG.

    Gac Sanit. 1997 May-Jun;11(3):143-9. Spanish.

    PMID:
    9340321
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Display Settings:

      Format
      Items per page
      Sort by

      Send to:

      Choose Destination

      Supplemental Content

      Find related data

      Write to the Help Desk