Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation.
Craig BM, Busschbach JJ.
Popul Health Metr. 2009 Jan 13;7:3.
Related citations
Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods.
Craig BM, Busschbach JJ, Salomon JA.
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):634-41.
Non-monotonicity in the episodic random utility model.
Menzies NA, Salomon JA.
Health Econ. 2011 Dec;20(12):1523-31. doi: 10.1002/hec.1683. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
Health Econ. 2010 Nov 18. [Epub ahead of print]
Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data.
Salomon JA.
Popul Health Metr. 2003 Dec 19;1(1):12.
Revisiting United States valuation of EQ-5D states.
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1057-63. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
Argentine valuation of the EQ-5D health states.
Augustovski FA, Irazola VE, Velazquez AP, Gibbons L, Craig BM.
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):587-96. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
From a different angle: a novel approach to health valuation.
Craig BM, Oppe M.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jan;70(2):169-74. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
Comparison of health state utility values derived using time trade-off, rank and discrete choice data anchored on the full health-dead scale.
Brazier J, Rowen D, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A.
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Sep 30. [Epub ahead of print]
Keep it simple: ranking health states yields values similar to cardinal measurement approaches.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):296-305. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
A Shortcut to Mean-Based Time Tradeoff Tariffs for the EQ-5D?
Rand-Hendriksen K, Augestad LA, Dahl FA, Kristiansen IS, Stavem K.
Med Decis Making. 2012 Jan 12. [Epub ahead of print]
[General population time trade-off values for 42 EQ-5D health states in South Korea].
Jo MW, Lee SI.
J Prev Med Public Health. 2007 Mar;40(2):169-76. Korean.
Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D.
Stolk EA, Oppe M, Scalone L, Krabbe PF.
Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):1005-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00783.x. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
Health-state valuations for pertussis: methods for valuing short-term health states.
Lee GM, Salomon JA, LeBaron CW, Lieu TA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Mar 21;3:17.
The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead.
Stalmeier PF, Busschbach JJ, Lamers LM, Krabbe PF.
Health Econ. 2005 Jul;14(7):679-85.
Toward a more universal approach in health valuation.
Health Econ. 2011 Jul;20(7):864-75. doi: 10.1002/hec.1650.
Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J, Burgess L.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):15-27. doi: 10.2165/11536960-000000000-00000.
Estimating an EQ-5D Value Set for Malaysia Using Time Trade-Off and Visual Analogue Scale Methods.
Md Yusof FA, Goh A, Azmi S.
Value Health. 2012 Jan;15(1 Suppl):S85-90.
A novel framework for validating and applying standardized small area measurement strategies.
Srebotnjak T, Mokdad AH, Murray CJ.
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Sep 29;8:26.
US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.
Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ.
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on