My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 158

    2.

    Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.

    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Dinnes J, Reitsma J, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

    Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(25):iii, 1-234. Review.PMID: 15193208 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.

    Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA.

    Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.PMID: 19787009 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.

    Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP.

    Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):666-76. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Review.PMID: 17470488 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

    Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, Porter AC, Tugwell P, Moher D, Bouter LM.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Feb 15;7:10.PMID: 17302989 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews.

    Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003 Nov 10;3:25.PMID: 14606960 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).

    Lucas NP, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 5. [Epub ahead of print]PMID: 20056381 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    9.

    [A tool (corrected) for the critical appraisal of epidemiological cross-sectional studies]

    Berra S, Elorza-Ricart JM, Estrada MD, Sánchez E.

    Gac Sanit. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):492-7. Spanish. Erratum in: Gac Sanit. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):625. PMID: 19000532 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research.

    Simunovic N, Sprague S, Bhandari M.

    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:87-94.PMID: 19411505 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews.

    Mallen C, Peat G, Croft P.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):765-9. Epub 2006 May 30. Review.PMID: 16828667 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Quality assessment of diagnostic before-after studies: development of methodology in the context of a systematic review.

    Meads CA, Davenport CF.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 19;9:3. Review.PMID: 19152699 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34. Epub 2009 Jul 23.PMID: 19631507 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review.

    Groenwold RH, Van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, Hak E.

    Ann Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):746-51. Epub 2008 Aug 9. Review.PMID: 18693038 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

    Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar S, Grimmer KA.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004 Sep 16;4:22. Review.PMID: 15369598 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.

    Bornhöft G, Maxion-Bergemann S, Wolf U, Kienle GS, Michalsen A, Vollmar HC, Gilbertson S, Matthiessen PF.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Dec 11;6:56.PMID: 17156475 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    [Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration]

    Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; Iniciativa STROBE.

    Gac Sanit. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(2):158. Epub 2009 Feb 26. Spanish. PMID: 19249134 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):W65-94. Epub 2009 Jul 20.PMID: 19622512 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of pneumonia in China]

    Hou ZK, Li JS, Yu XQ, Li B, Zhou HY, Zhang YX.

    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Apr;21(4):207-10. Chinese. PMID: 19374786 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    20.

    A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal length for predicting preterm birth.

    Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M, Higgins S.

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):134-42. Epub 2007 Apr 23. Review.PMID: 17452071 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data

    Write to the Help Desk