My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 454

    1.

    Correction: reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.

    Gluud LL, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Woods L, Harris R, Sterne JA.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):219. No abstract available. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 21;149(8):596. Kjaergard, Lise L [corrected to Gluud, Lise L]; Villumsen, John [removed]; Thorlund, Kristian [added]; Woods, Lesley [added]; Harris, Ross [added]; Sterne, Jonathan A C [added]. PMID: 18942172 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.

    Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C.

    Ann Intern Med. 2001 Dec 4;135(11):982-9. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):219. PMID: 11730399 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials.

    Klar N, Donner A.

    Stat Med. 2001 Dec 30;20(24):3729-40.PMID: 11782029 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.

    Donner A, Klar N.

    Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80.PMID: 12325113 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.

    Moher D, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Tugwell P, Moher M, Jones A, Pham B, Klassen TP.

    Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(12):i-iv, 1-98. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 10374081 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.

    Emerson JD, Burdick E, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC.

    Control Clin Trials. 1990 Oct;11(5):339-52.PMID: 1963128 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.

    Bereza BG, Machado M, Einarson TR.

    Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. Epub 2008 Sep 2.PMID: 18728102 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Meta-analysis of randomized trials: looking back and looking ahead.

    Yusuf S.

    Control Clin Trials. 1997 Dec;18(6):594-601; discussion 661-6. Review.PMID: 9408721 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Designing randomised trials: both large and small trials are needed.

    Stenning SP, Parmar MK.

    Ann Oncol. 2002;13 Suppl 4:131-8. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 12401679 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.

    Rosner A.

    J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Sep;26(7):460-7. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 12975633 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Intention to treat analysis is related to methodological quality.

    Ruiz-Canela M, Martínez-González MA, de Irala-Estévez J.

    BMJ. 2000 Apr 8;320(7240):1007-8. No abstract available. PMID: 10753165 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.

    Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):763-9. Epub 2008 Apr 14.PMID: 18411040 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Value and limitation of meta-analysis.

    Verstraete M.

    Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2002 Sep-Dec;32(5-6):278-81. Review. Erratum in: Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2003 May-Jun;33(3):172. PMID: 13679657 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.

    Walker A, Nixon J.

    J Wound Care. 2004 Mar;13(3):103-6. No abstract available. PMID: 15045804 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Reinventing the wheel will not make it rounder: controlled trials of homeopathy reconsidered.

    Walach H.

    J Altern Complement Med. 2003 Feb;9(1):7-13. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 12683353 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.

    Ferrer RL.

    Fam Med. 1998 Sep;30(8):579-83.PMID: 9773289 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Discrepancies among megatrials.

    Furukawa TA, Streiner DL, Hori S.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;53(12):1193-9.PMID: 11146264 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.

    Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S, Ackerman MB.

    World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):167-76.PMID: 18575311 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.

    Herbison P, Hay-Smith J, Gillespie WJ.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1249-56. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Review.PMID: 17098567 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Incorporation of sequential trials into a fixed effects meta-analysis.

    Todd S.

    Stat Med. 1997 Dec 30;16(24):2915-25.PMID: 9483723 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity