My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 131

    1.

    Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.

    Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Boggis CR, McGee MA, Griffiths PM, Duffy SW, Agbaje OF, Gillan MG, Wilson M, Jain AK, Barr N, Beetles UM, Griffiths MA, Johnson J, Roberts RM, Deans HE, Duncan KA, Iyengar G.

    Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(4):R72. Epub 2008 Aug 25.

    PMID:
    18724867
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article

    Related citations

    2.

    Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.

    Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Stapleton S, Young K, Castellino RA.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):377-84.

    PMID:
    17242245
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    3.

    Does computer-aided detection have a role in the arbitration of discordant double-reading opinions in a breast-screening programme?

    James JJ, Cornford EJ.

    Clin Radiol. 2009 Jan;64(1):46-51. Epub 2008 Sep 4.

    PMID:
    19070697
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    4.

    Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.

    Houssami N, Given-Wilson R, Ciatto S.

    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Apr;53(2):171-6. Review.

    PMID:
    19527363
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    5.

    Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading.

    Cawson JN, Nickson C, Amos A, Hill G, Whan AB, Kavanagh AM.

    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009 Oct;53(5):442-9.

    PMID:
    19788479
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    6.

    Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.

    Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E, Yeh ED, Rafferty EA, D'Alessandro HA, Staffa M, Hall DA, McCarthy KA, Kopans DB.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Nov;189(5):1135-41.

    PMID:
    17954651
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    7.

    Is computer aided detection (CAD) cost effective in screening mammography? A model based on the CADET II study.

    Guerriero C, Gillan MG, Cairns J, Wallis MG, Gilbert FJ.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 17;11:11.

    PMID:
    21241473
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article

    Related citations

    8.

    Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

    Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):185-90.

    PMID:
    14759985
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    9.

    Computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.

    Bolivar AV, Gomez SS, Merino P, Alonso-Bartolomé P, Garcia EO, Cacho PM, Hoffmeister JW.

    Acta Radiol. 2010 Dec;51(10):1086-92. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

    PMID:
    20883182
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    10.

    Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support.

    Samulski M, Hupse R, Boetes C, Mus RD, den Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N.

    Eur Radiol. 2010 Oct;20(10):2323-30. Epub 2010 Jun 9.

    PMID:
    20532890
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free PMC Article

    Related citations

    11.

    Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.

    Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ.

    Radiology. 2004 Mar;230(3):811-9. Epub 2004 Feb 5.

    PMID:
    14764891
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    12.

    Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Noble M, Bruening W, Uhl S, Schoelles K.

    Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):881-90. Epub 2008 Nov 21. Review.

    PMID:
    19023581
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    13.

    Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography.

    Alberdi E, Povykalo A, Strigini L, Ayton P.

    Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug;11(8):909-18.

    PMID:
    15354301
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    14.

    Implications of unchanged detection criteria with CAD as second reader of mammograms.

    Bornefalk H.

    Med Phys. 2006 Apr;33(4):922-9.

    PMID:
    16696467
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    15.

    Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography.

    Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, Gillan MG, Agbaje OF, Wallis MG, James J, Boggis CR, Duffy SW; CADET II Group.

    N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 16;359(16):1675-84. Epub 2008 Oct 1.

    PMID:
    18832239
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    16.

    Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities.

    Astley SM.

    Br J Radiol. 2004;77 Spec No 2:S194-200. Review.

    PMID:
    15677361
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    17.

    Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) devices.

    Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM.

    Br J Radiol. 2005;78 Spec No 1:S26-30.

    PMID:
    15917442
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Related citations

    18.

    Clinical versus research approach to breast cancer detection with CAD: where are we now?

    Brem RF.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jan;188(1):234-5. No abstract available. Erratum in: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):931.

    PMID:
    17179371
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    19.

    Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.

    Taylor P, Champness J, Given-Wilson R, Johnston K, Potts H.

    Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(6):iii, 1-58. Review.

    PMID:
    15717938
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

    20.

    Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection.

    Vyborny CJ, Doi T, O'Shaughnessy KF, Romsdahl HM, Schneider AC, Stein AA.

    Radiology. 2000 Jun;215(3):703-7.

    PMID:
    10831688
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free Article

    Related citations

      Display Settings:

      Format
      Items per page
      Sort by

      Send to:

      Choose Destination

      Supplemental Content

      Filter your results:

      Find related data

      Recent activity

      You are here: NCBI > Literature > PubMed
      Write to the Help Desk