My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 104

    1.

    A biomechanical study of plate versus intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation.

    Golish SR, Oliviero JA, Francke EI, Miller MD.

    J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Jul 16;3:28.PMID: 18631380 [PubMed - in process]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Effects of plate location and selection on the stability of midshaft clavicle osteotomies: a biomechanical study.

    Iannotti MR, Crosby LA, Stafford P, Grayson G, Goulet R.

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Sep-Oct;11(5):457-62.PMID: 12378164 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Biomechanical comparison of blade plate and intramedullary nail fixation for tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis.

    Lee AT, Sundberg EB, Lindsey DP, Harris AH, Chou LB.

    Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Feb;31(2):164-71.PMID: 20132755 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    4.

    Biomechanical evaluation of clavicle fracture plating techniques: does a locking plate provide improved stability?

    Celestre P, Roberston C, Mahar A, Oka R, Meunier M, Schwartz A.

    J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Apr;22(4):241-7.PMID: 18404033 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Biomechanical comparison of two alternative tibial plateau leveling osteotomy plates with the original standard in an axially loaded gap model: an in vitro study.

    Kloc PA 2nd, Kowaleski MP, Litsky AS, Brown NO, Johnson KA.

    Vet Surg. 2009 Jan;38(1):40-8.PMID: 19152616 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    In vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and limited-contact dynamic compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.

    Sod GA, Mitchell CF, Hubert JD, Martin GS, Gill MS.

    Vet Surg. 2008 Apr;37(3):283-8.PMID: 18394076 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of the 2.4 mm uniLOCK reconstruction plate using 2.4 mm locking versus standard screws for fixation of acetabular osteotomy in dogs.

    Amato NS, Richards A, Knight TA, Spector D, Boudrieau RJ, Belkoff S.

    Vet Surg. 2008 Dec;37(8):741-8.PMID: 19121169 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Biomechanical stability of intramedullary technique for fixation of joint depressed calcaneus fracture.

    Nelson JD, McIff TE, Moodie PG, Iverson JL, Horton GA.

    Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Mar;31(3):229-35.PMID: 20230701 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    10.

    Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.

    O'Toole RV, Andersen RC, Vesnovsky O, Alexander M, Topoleski LD, Nascone JW, Sciadini MF, Turen C, Eglseder WA Jr.

    J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(10):709-15.PMID: 18978547 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Mechanical comparison of 3.5 mm broad dynamic compression plate, broad limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and narrow locking compression plate systems using interfragmentary gap models.

    Uhl JM, Seguin B, Kapatkin AS, Schulz KS, Garcia TC, Stover SM.

    Vet Surg. 2008 Oct;37(7):663-73.PMID: 19134089 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Biomechanical evaluation of volar locking plates for distal radius fractures.

    Levin SM, Nelson CO, Botts JD, Teplitz GA, Kwon Y, Serra-Hsu F.

    Hand (N Y). 2008 Mar;3(1):55-60. Epub 2007 Aug 7.PMID: 18780122 [PubMed]Related articles

    13.

    Biomechanical stability of four fixation constructs for distal radius fractures.

    Capo JT, Kinchelow T, Brooks K, Tan V, Manigrasso M, Francisco K.

    Hand (N Y). 2009 Sep;4(3):272-8. Epub 2009 Feb 5.PMID: 19194766 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    14.

    Biomechanical evaluation of extramedullary versus intramedullary fixation for reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures.

    Kuzyk PR, Lobo J, Whelan D, Zdero R, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH.

    J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):31-8.PMID: 19104301 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Biomechanical comparison of screw versus plate/screw construct for talonavicular fusion.

    Jarrell SE 3rd, Owen JR, Wayne JS, Adelaar RS.

    Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Feb;30(2):150-6.PMID: 19254510 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.

    Tejwani NC, Murthy A, Park J, McLaurin TM, Egol KA, Kummer FJ.

    J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):795-9.PMID: 19276755 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.

    Quigley KJ, Alander DH, Bledsoe JG.

    J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Aug;21(6):442-7.PMID: 18679101 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Biomechanical comparison of different volar fracture fixation plates for distal radius fractures.

    Sobky K, Baldini T, Thomas K, Bach J, Williams A, Wolf JM.

    Hand (N Y). 2008 Jun;3(2):96-101. Epub 2007 Sep 7.PMID: 18780084 [PubMed]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    [Biomechanical evaluation of TiNi shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing plate and its effect on fracture healing]

    Yan X, Bao T, Zhao W, Yan F, Liang D, Ding Z.

    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;24(2):219-22. Chinese. PMID: 20187457 [PubMed - in process]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data

    Write to the Help Desk