Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Applying bioethical principles to human biomonitoring.
Harrison M.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S8.
Related citations
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.
Ethics issues experienced in HBM within Portuguese health surveillance and research projects.
Reis MF, Segurado S, Brantes A, Simões HT, Melim JM, Geraldes V, Miguel JP.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S5.
Societal and ethical issues in human biomonitoring--a view from science studies.
Bauer S.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S10.
Research on ethics in two large Human Biomonitoring projects ECNIS and NewGeneris: a bottom up approach.
Dumez B, Van Damme K, Casteleyn L.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S7.
Research on the socio-ethical impact of biomarker use and the communication processes in ECNIS NoE and NewGeneris IP.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 May;210(3-4):263-5. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
Human biomonitoring data interpretation and ethics; obstacles or surmountable challenges?
Sepai O, Collier C, Van Tongelen B, Casteleyn L.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S13.
Toxic ignorance and right-to-know in biomonitoring results communication: a survey of scientists and study participants.
Morello-Frosch R, Brody JG, Brown P, Altman RG, Rudel RA, Pérez C.
Environ Health. 2009 Feb 28;8:6. Review.
Biomonitoring and biomarkers: exposure assessment will never be the same.
Paustenbach D, Galbraith D.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Aug;114(8):1143-9. Review.
Precautionary principles: a jurisdiction-free framework for decision-making under risk.
Ricci PF, Cox LA Jr, MacDonald TR.
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004 Dec;23(12):579-600.
Ethical principles in health research and review process.
Tangwa GB.
Acta Trop. 2009 Nov;112 Suppl 1:S2-7. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
Banking of human tissue for biomonitoring and exposure assessment: utility for environmental epidemiology and surveillance.
Goldman LR, Anton-Culver H, Kharrazi M, Blake E.
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Apr;103 Suppl 3:31-4.
A new spin on research translation: the Boston Consensus Conference on Human Biomonitoring.
Nelson JW, Scammell MK, Altman RG, Webster TF, Ozonoff DM.
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Apr;117(4):495-9. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
Making sense of human biomonitoring data: findings and recommendations of a workshop.
Bahadori T, Phillips RD, Money CD, Quackenboss JJ, Clewell HJ, Bus JS, Robison SH, Humphris CJ, Parekh AA, Osborn K, Kauffman RM.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;17(4):308-13. Epub 2007 May 9.
Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from a public health risk perspective.
Hays SM, Becker RA, Leung HW, Aylward LL, Pyatt DW.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;47(1):96-109. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Review.
Conflicts of interest in research involving human beings.
Greco D, Diniz NM.
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):143-54, 202-3. Review.
The Precautionary Principle: implications for risk management strategies.
Saltelli A, Funtowicz S.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(1):47-57. Review.
Empirical investigation of the ethical reasoning of physicians and molecular biologists - the importance of the four principles of biomedical ethics.
Ebbesen M, Pedersen BD.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2007 Oct 25;2:23.
Bioethical committees and data protection issues in Poland.
Ligocka D.
Environ Health. 2008 Jun 5;7 Suppl 1:S4.
[Ethical analysis of the decision-making process in occupational health practice].
Franco G.
Med Lav. 2005 Sep-Oct;96(5):375-82. Review. Italian.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on