My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 204

    1.

    Breast cancer tumor growth estimated through mammography screening data.

    Weedon-Fekjaer H, Lindqvist BH, Vatten LJ, Aalen OO, Tretli S.

    Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(3):R41. Epub 2008 May 8.PMID: 18466608 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Estimating mean sojourn time and screening test sensitivity in breast cancer mammography screening: new results.

    Weedon-Fekjaer H, Vatten LJ, Aalen OO, Lindqvist B, Tretli S.

    J Med Screen. 2005;12(4):172-8.PMID: 16417693 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    First epidemiological analysis of breast cancer incidence and tumor characteristics after implementation of population-based digital mammography screening.

    Weigel S, Batzler WU, Decker T, Hense HW, Heindel W.

    Rofo. 2009 Dec;181(12):1144-50. Epub 2009 Oct 26.PMID: 19859859 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Estimating mean sojourn time and screening sensitivity using questionnaire data on time since previous screening.

    Weedon-Fekjaer H, Lindqvist BH, Vatten LJ, Aalen OO, Tretli S.

    J Med Screen. 2008;15(2):83-90.PMID: 18573776 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.

    Hofvind S, Vacek PM, Skelly J, Weaver DL, Geller BM.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 6;100(15):1082-91. Epub 2008 Jul 29.PMID: 18664650 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Markov models of breast tumor progression: some age-specific results.

    Duffy SW, Day NE, Tabár L, Chen HH, Smith TC.

    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):93-7.PMID: 9709283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.
    8.

    Comparison of cancer registry and clinical data as predictors for breast cancer survival.

    Seppänen J, Heinävaara S, Holli K, Hakulinen T.

    Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Dec;19(10):1299-304. Epub 2008 Aug 28.PMID: 18752035 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Estimation of mean sojourn time in breast cancer screening using a Markov chain model of both entry to and exit from the preclinical detectable phase.

    Duffy SW, Chen HH, Tabar L, Day NE.

    Stat Med. 1995 Jul 30;14(14):1531-43.PMID: 7481190 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts.

    Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Martinelli F, Lazzari B, Houssami N.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):860-6.PMID: 17885057 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.

    Okonkwo QL, Draisma G, der Kinderen A, Brown ML, de Koning HJ.

    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 17;100(18):1290-300. Epub 2008 Sep 9.PMID: 18780864 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Implementation of digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program: effect of screening round on recall rate and cancer detection.

    Sala M, Comas M, Macià F, Martinez J, Casamitjana M, Castells X.

    Radiology. 2009 Jul;252(1):31-9. Epub 2009 May 6.PMID: 19420316 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography.

    Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, de Koning HJ, Coebergh JW, van Beek M, Hooijen MJ, van de Poll-Franse LV.

    Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):774-81. Epub 2008 Dec 4.PMID: 19046632 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review.

    Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L.

    Lancet Oncol. 2007 Dec;8(12):1129-38. Review.PMID: 18054882 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    [Growth velocity of breast carcinoma and radiographic "early diagnoses"]

    Fournier DV, Kuttig H, Kubli F, Prager P, Stolpe H, Maier A, Hüter J.

    Strahlentherapie. 1976 Apr;151(4):318-32. German. PMID: 1265781 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.

    Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL.

    AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1010-8.PMID: 19770323 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    [Incidence of breast cancer before and after implementation of mammography screening]

    Hofvind S, Sørum R, Haldorsen T, Langmark F.

    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2006 Nov 16;126(22):2935-8. Norwegian. PMID: 17117191 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Early detection of breast cancer through population-based mammographic screening in Asian women: a comparison study between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

    Chuwa EW, Yeo AW, Koong HN, Wong CY, Yong WS, Tan PH, Ho JT, Wong JS, Ho GH.

    Breast J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):133-9.PMID: 19292798 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The growth law of primary breast cancer as inferred from mammography screening trials data.

    Hart D, Shochat E, Agur Z.

    Br J Cancer. 1998 Aug;78(3):382-7.PMID: 9703287 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Age and interval for screening mammography: whom do you believe?

    Venta LA, Goodhartz LA.

    Semin Surg Oncol. 1996 Sep-Oct;12(5):281-9. Review.PMID: 8873315 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data

    Write to the Help Desk