Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Capturing doping attitudes by self-report declarations and implicit assessment: a methodology study.
Petróczi A, Aidman EV, Nepusz T.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 Apr 21;3:9.
Related citations
Virtue or pretense? Looking behind self-declared innocence in doping.
Petróczi A, Aidman EV, Hussain I, Deshmukh N, Nepusz T, Uvacsek M, Tóth M, Barker J, Naughton DP.
PLoS One. 2010 May 5;5(5):e10457.
Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes' attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour.
Petróczi A.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2007 Nov 9;2:34.
Self-reported attitudes of elite athletes towards doping: differences between type of sport.
Alaranta A, Alaranta H, Holmila J, Palmu P, Pietilä K, Helenius I.
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;27(10):842-6. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT.
Banse R, Seise J, Zerbes N.
Z Exp Psychol. 2001;48(2):145-60.
Clean Olympians? Doping and anti-doping: the views of talented young British athletes.
Bloodworth A, McNamee M.
Int J Drug Policy. 2010 Jul;21(4):276-82. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes.
Uvacsek M, Nepusz T, Naughton DP, Mazanov J, Ránky MZ, Petróczi A.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011 Apr;21(2):224-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01041.x.
A conceptual framework for achieving performance enhancing drug compliance in sport.
Donovan RJ, Egger G, Kapernick V, Mendoza J.
Sports Med. 2002;32(4):269-84. Review.
Psychological drivers in doping: the life-cycle model of performance enhancement.
Petróczi A, Aidman E.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2008 Mar 10;3:7.
When old and frail is not the same: dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods.
Gast A, Rothermund K.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Mar;63(3):479-98.
Avoiding stimulus confounds in Implicit Association Tests by using the concepts as stimuli.
Steffens MC, Kirschbaum M, Glados P.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;47(Pt 2):217-43.
What goes well with physics? Measuring and altering the image of science.
Kessels U, Rau M, Hannover B.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Dec;76(Pt 4):761-80.
Doping, drugs and drug abuse among adolescents in the State of Thuringia (Germany): prevalence, knowledge and attitudes.
Wanjek B, Rosendahl J, Strauss B, Gabriel HH.
Int J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;28(4):346-53. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
Attitudes toward obese individuals among exercise science students.
Chambliss HO, Finley CE, Blair SN.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Mar;36(3):468-74.
Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements.
Czyzewska M, Ginsburg HJ.
Addict Behav. 2007 Jan;32(1):114-27. Epub 2006 May 3.
Positive implicit attitudes toward odor words.
Bulsing PJ, Smeets MA, van den Hout MA.
Chem Senses. 2007 Jul;32(6):525-34. Epub 2007 May 7.
The implicit association test outperforms the extrinsic affective Simon task as an implicit measure of inter-individual differences in attitudes.
De Houwer J, De Bruycker E.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):401-21.
Goal orientations and attitudes toward doping.
Sas-Nowosielski K, Swiatkowska L.
Int J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;29(7):607-12. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
An implicit non-self-report measure of attitudes to speeding: development and validation.
Hatfield J, Fernandes R, Faunce G, Job RF.
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Mar;40(2):616-27. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
Explicit and implicit attitudes towards food and physical activity in childhood obesity.
Craeynest M, Crombez G, De Houwer J, Deforche B, Tanghe A, De Bourdeaudhuij I.
Behav Res Ther. 2005 Sep;43(9):1111-20.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on