Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 328

    1.

    Systematic review: comparing routine and selective invasive strategies for the acute coronary syndrome.

    Qayyum R, Khalid MR, Adomaityte J, Papadakos SP, Messineo FC.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Feb 5;148(3):186-96. Review.PMID: 18252682 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.

    O'Donoghue M, Boden WE, Braunwald E, Cannon CP, Clayton TC, de Winter RJ, Fox KA, Lagerqvist B, McCullough PA, Murphy SA, Spacek R, Swahn E, Wallentin L, Windhausen F, Sabatine MS.

    JAMA. 2008 Jul 2;300(1):71-80.PMID: 18594042 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Mehta SR, Cannon CP, Fox KA, Wallentin L, Boden WE, Spacek R, Widimsky P, McCullough PA, Hunt D, Braunwald E, Yusuf S.

    JAMA. 2005 Jun 15;293(23):2908-17.PMID: 15956636 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina & non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era.

    Hoenig MR, Doust JA, Aroney CN, Scott IA.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;3:CD004815. Review.PMID: 16856061 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Long-term outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study.

    Hirsch A, Windhausen F, Tijssen JG, Verheugt FW, Cornel JH, de Winter RJ; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) investigators.

    Lancet. 2007 Mar 10;369(9564):827-35.PMID: 17350451 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Diverging associations of an intended early invasive strategy compared with actual revascularization, and outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the problem of treatment selection bias.

    Hirsch A, Windhausen F, Tijssen JG, Oude Ophuis AJ, van der Giessen WJ, van der Zee PM, Cornel JH, Verheugt FW, de Winter RJ; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes Investigators.

    Eur Heart J. 2009 Mar;30(6):645-54. Epub 2008 Sep 29.PMID: 18824461 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    How should patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction be managed? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    Choudhry NK, Singh JM, Barolet A, Tomlinson GA, Detsky AS.

    Am J Med. 2005 May;118(5):465-74. Review.PMID: 15866246 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    5-year outcome of an interventional strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial.

    Fox KA, Poole-Wilson P, Clayton TC, Henderson RA, Shaw TR, Wheatley DJ, Knight R, Pocock SJ.

    Lancet. 2005 Sep 10-16;366(9489):914-20.PMID: 16154018 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators.

    Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, Blaustein AS, Deedwania PC, Zoble RG, Wexler LF, Kleiger RE, Pepine CJ, Ferry DR, Chow BK, Lavori PW.

    N Engl J Med. 1998 Jun 18;338(25):1785-92. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1091. PMID: 9632444 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    The effect of routine, early invasive management on outcome for elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

    Bach RG, Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, DiBattiste PM, Demopoulos LA, Anderson HV, DeLucca PT, Mahoney EM, Murphy SA, Braunwald E.

    Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):186-95.PMID: 15289215 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    [The changes of electrocardiogram and impact of early invasive strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation]

    Zhao MZ, Hu DY, Zhang FC, Wu Y, Yan MY, Wang SW, Mao JM, Yang M, Jiang LQ.

    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Apr 6;85(13):879-82. Chinese. PMID: 16029524 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Use of coronary revascularization in patients with unstable and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

    Popma JJ, Suk J.

    Am J Cardiol. 2001 Oct 18;88(8A):25K-29K. Review.PMID: 11694216 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    An ischemia-guided approach for risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

    Pepine CJ.

    Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 28;86(12B):27M-35M.PMID: 11206016 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    5-year outcomes in the FRISC-II randomised trial of an invasive versus a non-invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: a follow-up study.

    Lagerqvist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Ståhle E, Swahn E, Wallentin L; Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease (FRISC-II) Investigators.

    Lancet. 2006 Sep 16;368(9540):998-1004.PMID: 16980115 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.
    16.

    Reanalysis of systematic reviews: the case of invasive strategies for acute coronary syndromes.

    Kuukasjärvi P, Nordhausen K, Malmivaara A.

    Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):484-96.PMID: 16984682 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Design and rationale of CURRENT-OASIS 7: a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial trial evaluating optimal dosing strategies for clopidogrel and aspirin in patients with ST and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an early invasive strategy.

    Mehta SR, Bassand JP, Chrolavicius S, Diaz R, Fox KA, Granger CB, Jolly S, Rupprecht HJ, Widimsky P, Yusuf S; CURRENT-OASIS 7 Steering Committee.

    Am Heart J. 2008 Dec;156(6):1080-1088.e1. Epub 2008 Nov 1.PMID: 19033002 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Routine upstream initiation vs deferred selective use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: the ACUITY Timing trial.

    Stone GW, Bertrand ME, Moses JW, Ohman EM, Lincoff AM, Ware JH, Pocock SJ, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Jafar MZ, Chandna H, Hartmann F, Leisch F, Strasser RH, Desaga M, Stuckey TD, Zelman RB, Lieber IH, Cohen DJ, Mehran R, White HD; ACUITY Investigators.

    JAMA. 2007 Feb 14;297(6):591-602.PMID: 17299194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Early Invasive Strategy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Report From TACTICS-TIMI 18.

    Kugelmass AD, Sadanandan S, Lakkis N, Dibattiste PM, Robertson DH, Demopoulos LA, Gibson CM, Weintraub WS, Murphy SA, Cannon CP; for the TACTICS TIMI-18 Investigators.

    Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2006 Sep;5(3):167-172.PMID: 18340233 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]Related articles

    20.

    ST-segment deviation on the admission electrocardiogram, treatment strategy, and outcome in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes A substudy of the Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Trial.

    Windhausen F, Hirsch A, Tijssen JG, Cornel JH, Verheugt FW, Klees MI, de Winter RJ; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) investigators.

    J Electrocardiol. 2007 Sep-Oct;40(5):408-15. Epub 2007 Jul 2.PMID: 17604045 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data