Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 135

    1.

    Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma.

    Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan AC, Heijl A.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;92(4):569-73. Epub 2008 Jan 22. Review.PMID: 18211935 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression.

    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;145(2):343-53.PMID: 18078852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Towards an optimal perimetric strategy for progression detection in glaucoma: from fixed-space to adaptive inter-test intervals.

    Jansonius NM.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;244(3):390-3. Epub 2005 Jul 28.PMID: 16049704 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss.

    Bass SJ, Cooper J, Feldman J, Horn D.

    Optometry. 2007 Aug;78(8):390-5.PMID: 17662927 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Progression detection in glaucoma can be made more efficient by using a variable interval between successive visual field tests.

    Jansonius NM.

    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;245(11):1647-51. Epub 2007 Apr 17.PMID: 17437124 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Comparison of methods to predict visual field progression in glaucoma.

    Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Ralli M, Caprioli J.

    Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;125(9):1176-81.PMID: 17846355 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    Longitudinal variability of optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements.

    Leung CK, Cheung CY, Lin D, Pang CP, Lam DS, Weinreb RN.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Nov;49(11):4886-92. Epub 2008 Jun 6.PMID: 18539940 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    [How to assess the stability of glaucoma? Visual field]

    Nordmann JP.

    J Fr Ophtalmol. 2006 May;29 Spec No 2:22-6. French. PMID: 17072217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    The loss of visual function in glaucoma.

    Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Weinreb RN.

    Semin Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;15(4):182-93. Review.PMID: 17585433 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    [Comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and achromatic standard automated perimetry in patients with migraine without aura and controls]

    Göbel K, Boyraz M, Schröder A, Erb C.

    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008 Aug;225(8):718-22. German. PMID: 18712657 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.

    Miranda MA, Henson DB.

    Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;86(2):202-6. Epub 2007 Nov 14.PMID: 18005269 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness.

    Owen VM, Crabb DP, White ET, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;49(6):2449-55.PMID: 18515585 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    14.

    Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.

    Capris P, Autuori S, Capris E, Papadia M.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):182-90.PMID: 18320509 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    [Agreement and correlation between the frequency doubling perimetry and the blue-yellow perimetry in glaucoma: no support for selective damage]

    Magacho L, Reis R, Magacho B, Avila MP.

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 May-Jun;70(3):509-12. Portuguese. PMID: 17768561 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Correlation of Disc Damage Likelihood Scale, visual field, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in patients with glaucoma.

    Hornova J, Kuntz Navarro JB, Prasad A, Freitas DG, Nunes CM.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Sep-Oct;18(5):739-47.PMID: 18850552 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    [Influence of visual function on quality of life in patients with glaucoma]

    Carrasco-Font C, Lorenzo-Martínez S, Gili-Manzanaro P, Arias-Puente A, Andrés-Alba Y, Matilla-Rodríguez A, Ortigueira JA.

    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2008 Apr;83(4):249-55. Spanish. PMID: 18373298 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Risk factors for first presentation of glaucoma with significant visual field loss.

    Deva NC, Insull E, Gamble G, Danesh-Meyer HV.

    Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;36(3):217-21.PMID: 18412589 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data