My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 1247

    1.

    Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

    Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):111-23. Review.PMID: 18195336 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]

    Davoli M, Amato L, Minozzi S, Bargagli AM, Vecchi S, Perucci CA.

    Epidemiol Prev. 2005 May-Aug;29(3-4 Suppl):3-63. Italian. PMID: 16529350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

    Marshall MN, Shekelle PG, Leatherman S, Brook RH.

    JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1866-74.PMID: 10770149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care.

    Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB.

    Ann Intern Med. 2005 Feb 15;142(4):260-73. Review.PMID: 15710959 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

    Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ.

    Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28. Review.PMID: 16147767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

    Werner RM, Asch DA.

    JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1239-44.PMID: 15755946 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Public reporting in health care: how do consumers use quality-of-care information? A systematic review.

    Faber M, Bosch M, Wollersheim H, Leatherman S, Grol R.

    Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):1-8. Review.PMID: 19106724 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care?

    Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S.

    Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):265-72. Review.PMID: 16908917 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    What can we say about the impact of public reporting? Inconsistent execution yields variable results.

    Hibbard JH.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):160-1. No abstract available. PMID: 18195340 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Costs and benefits of health information technology.

    Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB.

    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71. Review.PMID: 17627328 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    An improvement focus in public reporting: the Queensland approach.

    Duckett SJ, Collins J, Kamp M, Walker K.

    Med J Aust. 2008 Dec 1-15;189(11-12):616-7.PMID: 19061447 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review.

    Walsh JM, McDonald KM, Shojania KG, Sundaram V, Nayak S, Lewis R, Owens DK, Goldstein MK.

    Med Care. 2006 Jul;44(7):646-57. Review.PMID: 16799359 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

    Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.

    Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26.PMID: 11679863 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Quality of care developments. 1993 update.

    Sundwall DN.

    Qual Lett Healthc Lead. 1993 Jun;5(5 Suppl):Si-iii, S1-13.PMID: 10126929 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

    Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB.

    JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223-38. Review.PMID: 15755945 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Payment for performance: in sickness and in health. For better or for worse?

    Goldman RS.

    Blood Purif. 2006;24(1):28-32.PMID: 16361837 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Performance measurement in the small office practice: challenges and potential solutions.

    Landon BE, Normand SL.

    Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 4;148(5):353-7.PMID: 18316754 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    Ensuring rational public reporting systems for health care-associated infections: systematic literature review and evaluation recommendations.

    McKibben L, Fowler G, Horan T, Brennan PJ.

    Am J Infect Control. 2006 Apr;34(3):142-9. Review.PMID: 16630978 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature.

    de Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van Der Voort P, Westert G.

    Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Apr;21(2):119-29. Epub 2009 Jan 20. Review.PMID: 19155288 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    The US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's activities in patient safety research.

    Meyer GS, Battles J, Hart JC, Tang N.

    Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Dec;15 Suppl 1:i25-30. Review.PMID: 14660520 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity