Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 622

    1.

    Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.

    Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;92(2):241-4. Epub 2007 Nov 9.PMID: 17993577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.

    Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, Ferris FL 3rd, SanGiovanni JP, Johnson CA, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cox TA, Blair RC, Kraker RT.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Feb;135(2):194-205.PMID: 12566024 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.

    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):701-6.PMID: 12928680 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.

    Rosser DA, Laidlaw DA, Murdoch IE.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):432-6.PMID: 11264133 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children.

    Stewart CE, Hussey A, Davies N, Moseley MJ.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Nov;26(6):597-601.PMID: 17040424 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.

    Cotter SA, Chu RH, Chandler DL, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Rice ML, Hertle RW, Birch EE, Moke PS.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):655-61.PMID: 14516805 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.

    Chen SI, Chandna A, Norcia AM, Pettet M, Stone D.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb;47(2):614-9.PMID: 16431958 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.

    Ruamviboonsuk P, Tiensuwan M, Kunawut C, Masayaanon P.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):662-9.PMID: 14516806 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.

    Birch EE, Strauber SF, Beck RW, Holmes JM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.

    J AAPOS. 2009 Feb;13(1):75-8. Epub 2008 Oct 10.PMID: 18848480 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.

    Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Aug;17(6):754-8.PMID: 12928690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.

    Becker R, Teichler G, Gräf M.

    Strabismus. 2007 Jan-Mar;15(1):3-6.PMID: 17523039 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.

    Ruamviboonsuk P, Tiensuwan M.

    J Med Assoc Thai. 2002 Jun;85(6):673-81.PMID: 12322840 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    The effect of optical defocus on the test-retest variability of visual acuity measurements.

    Rosser DA, Murdoch IE, Cousens SN.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Apr;45(4):1076-9.PMID: 15037571 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements?

    Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Aug;44(8):3278-81.PMID: 12882770 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    The accuracy of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

    Felius J, Wang YZ, Birch EE.

    J AAPOS. 2003 Dec;7(6):406-12.PMID: 14730293 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

    Moke PS, Turpin AH, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Repka MX, Birch EE, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Miller JM, Johnson CA.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Dec;132(6):903-9.PMID: 11730656 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    A comparison of Lea Symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism.

    Dobson V, Clifford-Donaldson CE, Miller JM, Garvey KA, Harvey EM.

    J AAPOS. 2009 Jun;13(3):253-7. Epub 2009 Apr 5.PMID: 19345596 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Improving the reliability of visual acuity measures in young children.

    McGraw PV, Winn B, Gray LS, Elliott DB.

    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000 May;20(3):173-84.PMID: 10897339 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data