My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 468

    1.

    How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis.

    Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D.

    Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 21;147(4):224-33. Epub 2007 Jul 16.PMID: 17638714 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    [Bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews in the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration. Its role in evidence-based decision making in neonatology]

    González de Dios J.

    An Pediatr (Barc). 2004 May;60(5):417-27. Spanish. PMID: 15104996 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?

    French SD, McDonald S, McKenzie JE, Green SE.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Oct 14;5:33.PMID: 16225692 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.

    Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, Sheikh A.

    J R Soc Med. 2006 Sep;99(9):470-2. Review.PMID: 16946391 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.

    Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jun;61(6):531-6.PMID: 18471656 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews.

    Sampson M, Shojania KG, McGowan J, Daniel R, Rader T, Iansavichene AE, Ji J, Ansari MT, Moher D.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Aug;61(8):755-62. Epub 2008 Feb 14.PMID: 18586179 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.

    Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I.

    J R Soc Med. 2007 Apr;100(4):187-90.PMID: 17404342 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals.

    Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, Klassen TP, Tugwell P, Moher M, Moher D.

    JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):278-80.PMID: 9676681 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    A review of the methodological features of systematic reviews in maternal medicine.

    Sheikh L, Johnston S, Thangaratinam S, Kilby MD, Khan KS.

    BMC Med. 2007 May 24;5:10. Review.PMID: 17524137 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

    Garside R, Pitt M, Anderson R, Rogers G, Dyer M, Mealing S, Somerville M, Price A, Stein K.

    Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. Review.PMID: 17999840 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.

    Manchikanti L.

    Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Review.PMID: 18354710 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.

    Chan KS, Morton SC, Shekelle PG.

    Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):806-12.PMID: 15623270 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence-based patient information.

    Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J.

    J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Mar;61(3):262-70.PMID: 17325406 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.

    Shojania KG, Bero LA.

    Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):157-62.PMID: 11525102 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    When and how to update systematic reviews.

    Moher D, Tsertsvadze A, Tricco AC, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Sampson M, Barrowman N.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):MR000023. Review.PMID: 18254126 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews.

    Piehl JH, Green S, McDonald S.

    BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jan 17;3(1):2.PMID: 12533194 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

    Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ.

    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):43-54.PMID: 12897595 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Cochrane neonatal systematic reviews: a survey of the evidence for neonatal therapies.

    Sinclair JC, Haughton DE, Bracken MB, Horbar JD, Soll RF.

    Clin Perinatol. 2003 Jun;30(2):285-304.PMID: 12875355 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The process of systematic review and its application in agri-food public-health.

    Sargeant JM, Rajic A, Read S, Ohlsson A.

    Prev Vet Med. 2006 Aug 17;75(3-4):141-51. Epub 2006 May 24. Review.PMID: 16725217 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Updating a systematic review--what difference did it make? Case study of nicotine replacement therapy.

    Stead LF, Lancaster T, Silagy CA.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:10. Epub 2001 Nov 1.PMID: 11734066 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity