My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 1593

    1.

    Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.

    Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I.

    J R Soc Med. 2007 Apr;100(4):187-90.PMID: 17404342 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.

    Clarke M, Alderson P, Chalmers I.

    JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2799-801.PMID: 12038916 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents?

    Clarke M, Chalmers I.

    JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):280-2.PMID: 9676682 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    4.

    Comparison of reports of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in surgical journals: literature review.

    Panesar SS, Thakrar R, Athanasiou T, Sheikh A.

    J R Soc Med. 2006 Sep;99(9):470-2. Review.PMID: 16946391 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.

    de Craen AJ, van Vliet HA, Helmerhorst FM.

    J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Mar;58(3):311-3.PMID: 15718121 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    [Bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews in the Neonatal Cochrane Collaboration. Its role in evidence-based decision making in neonatology]

    González de Dios J.

    An Pediatr (Barc). 2004 May;60(5):417-27. Spanish. PMID: 15104996 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    7.

    The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews.

    Moher D, Pham B, Lawson ML, Klassen TP.

    Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(41):1-90. Review.PMID: 14670218 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    8.

    Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.

    Egger M, Jüni P, Bartlett C; CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials).

    JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1996-9.PMID: 11308437 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    9.

    The use of systematic reviews when designing studies.

    Cooper NJ, Jones DR, Sutton AJ.

    Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):260-4.PMID: 16279149 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.

    Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Smith HS.

    Pain Physician. 2008 Nov-Dec;11(6):717-73. Review.PMID: 19057624 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    11.

    Reporting adverse events in randomized controlled trials.

    Nuovo J, Sather C.

    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Mar;16(3):349-51.PMID: 16998947 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.

    Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team.

    BMC Med. 2003 Nov 24;1:2.PMID: 14633274 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Medical journals' conflicts of interest in the publication of book reviews.

    Davis RM, Neale AV, Monsur JC.

    Sci Eng Ethics. 2003 Oct;9(4):471-83.PMID: 14652900 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Need for quality improvement in renal systematic reviews.

    Mrkobrada M, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Haynes RB, Iansavichus AV, Rehman F, Garg AX.

    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Jul;3(4):1102-14. Epub 2008 Apr 9.PMID: 18400967 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals?

    McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB.

    BMC Med. 2004 Sep 6;2:33.PMID: 15350200 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    16.

    Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.

    Puffer S, Torgerson D, Watson J.

    BMJ. 2003 Oct 4;327(7418):785-9. Review.PMID: 14525877 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews.

    Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, Jüni P, Klassen T, Le Lorier J, Liberati A, Linde K, Penna A.

    Lancet. 1996 Feb 10;347(8998):363-6.PMID: 8598702 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals.

    Moreira ED Jr, Stein Z, Susser E.

    Braz J Med Biol Res. 2001 Nov;34(11):1441-6.PMID: 11668354 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    19.

    Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 3: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials.

    Manchikanti L, Benyamin RM, Helm S, Hirsch JA.

    Pain Physician. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):35-72. Review.PMID: 19165297 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    An analysis of papers published in the British and European Journals of Orthodontics.

    Harrison JE, Ashby D, Lennon MA.

    Br J Orthod. 1996 Aug;23(3):203-9.PMID: 8894152 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity