My NCBI | Sign In
RSS Settings
  • Search:

Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 96

    1.

    A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;91(10):1285-7. Epub 2007 Mar 27.PMID: 17389740 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.

    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun;87(6):690-4. Erratum in: Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Aug;87(8):1054. PMID: 12770962 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    3.

    Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

    Iester M, Capris P, Altieri M, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.

    Int Ophthalmol. 1999;23(2):99-103.PMID: 11196128 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma]

    Kampmeier J, Eisert B, Buchwald HJ, Lang GK, Lang GE.

    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001 Mar;218(3):157-67. German. PMID: 11322052 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.

    Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Drance SM, Gaasterland D, Mills RP, Ashburn F, Hnik P, Van Coevorden RE.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 Nov;104(11):1910-7.PMID: 9373125 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.

    Iester M, Mermoud A, Schnyder C.

    Ophthalmology. 2000 Feb;107(2):288-94.PMID: 10690827 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.

    Chen YH, Wu JN, Chen JT, Lu DW.

    Ophthalmologica. 2008;222(6):400-7. Epub 2008 Sep 10.PMID: 18781091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.

    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.

    Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):206-15.PMID: 16458091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.

    Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jul;46(7):2451-7.PMID: 15980235 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    10.

    Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.

    Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;143(2):263-271. Epub 2006 Nov 27.PMID: 17178091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.

    Iester M, Altieri M, Vittone P, Calabria G, Zingirian M, Traverso CE.

    Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;135(1):35-9.PMID: 12504694 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.

    Schaumberger M, Schäfer B, Lachenmayr BJ.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jun;36(7):1390-7.PMID: 7775117 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    13.

    Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

    Teesalu P, Airaksinen PJ, Tuulonen A.

    Ophthalmology. 1998 Nov;105(11):2077-81.PMID: 9818609 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Relationship between indices of Humphrey perimetry and Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry in glaucoma.

    Fukushima A, Shirakashi M, Yaoeda K, Funaki S, Funaki H, Ofuchi N, Abe H.

    J Glaucoma. 2004 Apr;13(2):114-9.PMID: 15097256 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.

    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):582-8. Epub 2008 Jul 31.PMID: 18669543 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

    Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W.

    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001;(279):23-33.PMID: 11344712 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects]

    Reiser EM, Lachenmayr BJ, Vivell PM.

    Ophthalmologe. 1992 Dec;89(6):472-6. German. PMID: 1486263 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.

    Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J.

    Ophthalmology. 2007 May;114(5):931-7. Epub 2007 Mar 30.PMID: 17397926 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    Effect of myopia on frequency-doubling perimetry.

    Ito A, Kawabata H, Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Apr;42(5):1107-10.PMID: 11274092 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.

    Huang AS, Smith SD, Quigley HA.

    J Glaucoma. 1998 Jun;7(3):158-64.PMID: 9627854 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Filter your results:

    Find related data

    Recent activity