Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 108

    1.

    Efficiency of Rarebit perimetry in the evaluation of homonymous hemianopia in stroke patients.

    Gedik S, Akman A, Akova YA.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Aug;91(8):1065-9. Epub 2007 Feb 14.PMID: 17301122 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    2.

    A new visual field test in empty sella syndrome: rarebit perimetry.

    Yavas GF, Küsbeci T, Eser O, Ermis SS, Coşar M, Oztürk F.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):628-32.PMID: 18609487 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Does frequency doubling technology perimetry reliably detect neurological visual field defects?

    Fong KC, Byles DB, Constable PH.

    Eye (Lond). 2003 Apr;17(3):330-3.PMID: 12724694 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    [Computerized and manual perimetry in patients with severe temporal visual field defects due to suprasellar tumors]

    Pereira A, Monteiro ML.

    Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005 Sep-Oct;68(5):587-91. Epub 2005 Nov 28. Portuguese. PMID: 16322852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    5.

    Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.

    Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Parisi L, Zeppieri M.

    Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;89(2):180-4.PMID: 15665349 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    6.

    A comparison between Humphrey and frequency doubling perimetry for chiasmal visual field defects.

    Noval S, Contreras I, Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Ruiz de Zárate B.

    Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov-Dec;15(6):739-45.PMID: 16329059 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

    Bengtsson B.

    Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Dec;80(6):620-6.PMID: 12485283 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    Different strategies for Humphrey automated perimetry: FASTPAC, SITA standard and SITA fast in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

    Roggen X, Herman K, Van Malderen L, Devos M, Spileers W.

    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 2001;(279):23-33.PMID: 11344712 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients.

    Iester M, Perdicchi A, De Feo F, Fiesoletti E, Amodeo S, Sanna G, Leonardi A, Calabria G.

    J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):281-5.PMID: 16865003 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    [Confrontation test using Bagolini striated glasses--a new screening method for detection of quandrantanopia and hemianopia]

    Jünemann A.

    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1998 Jun;212(6):449-53. German. PMID: 9715465 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    SITA standard in optic neuropathies and hemianopias: a comparison with full threshold testing.

    Wall M, Punke SG, Stickney TL, Brito CF, Withrow KR, Kardon RH.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Feb;42(2):528-37.PMID: 11157893 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    12.

    The relationship between Rarebit perimetry and OCT-derived retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in glaucoma.

    Katsanos A, Labiris G, Fanariotis M, Tsirouki T, Chatzoulis D.

    Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):871-6. Epub 2008 Jun 19.PMID: 18616616 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    An unusual homonymous visual field defect.

    Wein F, Miller NR.

    Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Jan-Feb;44(4):324-8.PMID: 10667438 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    Sensitivity and specificity of the Humphrey Matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias.

    Taravati P, Woodward KR, Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Redline D, Carolan J, Huang CQ, Wall M.

    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Mar;49(3):924-8.PMID: 18326713 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    15.

    Nasal retinal nerve fiber layer attenuation: a biomarker for vigabatrin toxicity.

    Lawthom C, Smith PE, Wild JM.

    Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):565-71. Epub 2009 Jan 24.PMID: 19168223 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Pediatric homonymous hemianopia.

    Kedar S, Zhang X, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V.

    J AAPOS. 2006 Jun;10(3):249-52.PMID: 16814179 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    17.

    Comparison of the frequency doubling technology screening algorithm and the Humphrey 24-2 SITA-FAST in a large eye screening.

    Allen CS, Sponsel WE, Trigo Y, Dirks MS, Flynn WJ.

    Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;30(1):8-14.PMID: 11885802 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    18.

    High-pass resolution perimetry and a Humphrey Field Analyzer as indicators of glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities. A comparative study.

    Kono Y, Chi QM, Tomita G, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y.

    Ophthalmology. 1997 Sep;104(9):1496-502.PMID: 9307647 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    [Peripheral homonymous hemianopia. A case report]

    Reche-Sainz JA, Domingo-Gordo B, Toledano-Fernández N.

    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005 Aug;80(8):475-8. Spanish. PMID: 16136402 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    20.

    Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.

    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.

    Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):206-15.PMID: 16458091 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data