Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.
Haddrill PR, Halligan DL, Tomaras D, Charlesworth B.
Genome Biol. 2007;8(2):R18.
Related citations
Elevated levels of expression associated with regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.
Haddrill PR, Waldron FM, Charlesworth B.
Biol Lett. 2008 Dec 23;4(6):758-61.
Molecular evolution in non-recombining regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
Campos JL, Charlesworth B, Haddrill PR.
Genome Biol Evol. 2012 Jan 23. [Epub ahead of print]
Background selection in single genes may explain patterns of codon bias.
Loewe L, Charlesworth B.
Genetics. 2007 Mar;175(3):1381-93. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.
Comeron JM, Kreitman M.
Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):389-410.
Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
Comeron JM, Guthrie TB.
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2519-30. Epub 2005 Aug 24.
Hill-Robertson interference is a minor determinant of variations in codon bias across Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes.
Marais G, Piganeau G.
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Sep;19(9):1399-406.
Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A.
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;19(1):1-11.
Codon usage in twelve species of Drosophila.
Vicario S, Moriyama EN, Powell JR.
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 15;7:226.
Recombination, dominance and selection on amino acid polymorphism in the Drosophila genome: contrasting patterns on the X and fourth chromosomes.
Sheldahl LA, Weinreich DM, Rand DM.
Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1195-208.
Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome.
Langley CH, Lazzaro BP, Phillips W, Heikkinen E, Braverman JM.
Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1837-52.
Patterns of DNA-sequence divergence between Drosophila miranda and D. pseudoobscura.
Marion de Procé S, Halligan DL, Keightley PD, Charlesworth B.
J Mol Evol. 2009 Dec;69(6):601-11. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.
McVean GA, Vieira J.
Genetics. 2001 Jan;157(1):245-57.
Intron length evolution in Drosophila.
Presgraves DC.
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):2203-13. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
Linkage limits the power of natural selection in Drosophila.
Betancourt AJ, Presgraves DC.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15;99(21):13616-20. Epub 2002 Oct 7.
Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.
Stevison LS, Noor MA.
J Mol Evol. 2010 Dec;71(5-6):332-45. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
Rates and patterns of molecular evolution in inbred and outbred Arabidopsis.
Wright SI, Lauga B, Charlesworth D.
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Sep;19(9):1407-20.
Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans.
Haddrill PR, Bachtrog D, Andolfatto P.
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Sep;25(9):1825-34. Epub 2008 May 29.
Correlated evolution of synonymous and nonsynonymous sites in Drosophila.
Marais G, Domazet-Loso T, Tautz D, Charlesworth B.
J Mol Evol. 2004 Dec;59(6):771-9.
The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.
Genetics. 2000 Nov;156(3):1175-90.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on