Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Bench-to-bedside review: human subjects research--are more standards needed?
Huang DT, Hadian M.
Crit Care. 2006;10(6):244. Review.
Related citations
Protecting human subjects: how much responsibility falls to editorial boards?
Wegman DH, Major E.
Am J Ind Med. 2009 Feb;52(2):172-5.
Responsible conduct of radiology research: part II. Regulatory requirements for human research.
Cooper JA.
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):748-52.
Clinical research 2: legal and ethical issues in research.
Endacott R.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2004 Oct;20(5):313-5. No abstract available.
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.
Coleman CH, Bouësseau MC.
BMC Med Ethics. 2008 Mar 28;9:6.
Current status of the research ethics committees in Thailand.
Panichkul S, Mahaisavariya P, Morakote N, Condo S, Caengow S, Ketunpanya A.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Aug;94(8):1013-8.
Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
Lynn MR, Nelson DK.
Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Jul;18(3):264-70.
Working with the institutional review board.
Byerly WG.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 15;66(2):176-84. Review.
The history and moral foundations of human-subject research.
Blustein J.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;86(2):82-5. No abstract available.
[Regulation of medical research--why and how].
Simonsen S, Nylenna M.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Aug 26;124(16):2133-6. Norwegian. No abstract available.
Responsible conduct of radiology research. Part IV. The boundary of research and practice.
Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):383-4.
Institutional review board consideration of chart reviews, case reports, and observational studies.
Neff MJ.
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1350-3. Review.
Disclosing conflicts of interest in clinical research: views of institutional review boards, conflict of interest committees, and investigators.
Weinfurt KP, Friedman JY, Dinan MA, Allsbrook JS, Hall MA, Dhillon JK, Sugarman J.
J Law Med Ethics. 2006 Fall;34(3):581-91, 481.
Ethical considerations in psychopharmacological research involving decisionally impaired subjects.
Rosenstein DL, Miller FG.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Dec;171(1):92-7. Epub 2003 May 28. Review.
Ethical and legal issues in conducting research involving elderly subjects.
High DM, Doole MM.
Behav Sci Law. 1995 Summer;13(3):319-35. Review.
IOM report on the system for protecting human research participants.
Beauchamp TL.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Dec;12(4):389-90. No abstract available.
The evolution of standards for experimental treatment or research.
Slovenko R.
J Psychiatry Law. 2005 Spring;33(1):129-74. No abstract available.
Handbook of medical ethics: ethics in biomedical research.
[No authors listed]
Issues Med Ethics. 1996 Jul-Sep;4(3):90-3. No abstract available.
Institutional review board approval: why it matters.
Parvizi J, Tarity TD, Conner K, Smith JB.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Feb;89(2):418-26. Review.
Intrinsic conflicts of interest in clinical research: a need for disclosure.
Sollitto S, Hoffman S, Mehlman M, Lederman RJ, Youngner SJ, Lederman MM.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003 Jun;13(2):83-91.
Filter your results:
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on