Display Settings:

Format
Items per page
Sort by

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Results: 1 to 20 of 369

    1.

    Patient-centred measurement in ophthalmology--a paradigm shift.

    Pesudovs K.

    BMC Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun 15;6:25. Review.PMID: 16774690 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    2.

    The patient's perspective on complications after spine surgery.

    Grob D, Mannion AF.

    Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:380-5. Epub 2009 Apr 24.PMID: 19390874 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    3.

    Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

    Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Cella D, Basch E; ISPOR ePRO Task Force.

    Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. Epub 2008 Nov 11.PMID: 19900250 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    4.

    The use of outcomes instruments in the assessment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

    Haher TR, Valdevit A.

    Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:543-50. Review.PMID: 15948479 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    5.

    Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery.

    Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T.

    Surgery. 2009 Sep;146(3):435-43. Epub 2009 May 28. Review.PMID: 19715800 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    6.

    Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?

    Lattig F, Grob D, Kleinstueck FS, Porchet F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, O'Riordan D, Mannion AF.

    Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:386-94. Epub 2009 May 22.PMID: 19462185 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    7.

    Use of a standardized patient satisfaction questionnaire to assess the quality of care provided by ophthalmology residents.

    Jagadeesan R, Kalyan DN, Lee P, Stinnett S, Challa P.

    Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):738-743.e3. Epub 2007 Aug 22.PMID: 17716737 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    8.

    The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires.

    Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, Elliott DB.

    Optom Vis Sci. 2007 Aug;84(8):663-74. Review.PMID: 17700331 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    9.

    Seeking the patient's perspective: a qualitative assessment of EuroQol, COOP-WONCA charts and MYMOP.

    Paterson C.

    Qual Life Res. 2004 Jun;13(5):871-81.PMID: 15233501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    10.

    The use of patient-centered outcome measures in radiology: a systematic review.

    Mathers SA, Chesson RA, Proctor JM, McKenzie GA, Robertson E.

    Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov;13(11):1394-404. Review.PMID: 17070458 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    11.

    A practical instrument to explore patients' needs in palliative care: the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire short version.

    Osse BH, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Schadé E, Grol RP.

    Palliat Med. 2007 Jul;21(5):391-9.PMID: 17901098 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    12.

    Concepts underlying outcome measures in studies of consultations in general practice.

    Andén A, Andersson SO, Rudebeck CE.

    Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Dec;24(4):218-23. Review.PMID: 17118861 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    13.

    Next steps for use of item response theory in the assessment of health outcomes.

    Hays RD, Lipscomb J.

    Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:195-9. Epub 2007 Mar 10.PMID: 17351825 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    14.

    The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice.

    Mannion AF, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, Lattig F, Jeszenszky D, Bartanusz V, Dvorak J, Grob D.

    Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3:367-73. Epub 2009 Mar 25.PMID: 19319578 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    15.

    Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments.

    Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, Klassen A, McCarthy C, Collins ED, Cordeiro PG.

    Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Sep 15;120(4):823-37; discussion 838-9. Review.PMID: 17805107 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    16.

    Monitoring outcomes of arthritis and longitudinal data collection using patient questionnaires in routine care.

    Yazici Y.

    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2006;64(1-2):40-4. Review.PMID: 17121488 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    17.

    Does it matter whether the recipient of patient questionnaires in general practice is the general practitioner or an independent researcher? The REPLY randomised trial.

    Desborough JA, Butters P, Bhattacharya D, Holland RC, Wright DJ.

    BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jun 27;8:42.PMID: 18588670 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articlesFree article

    18.

    [A proposal for reforming psychologists' training in France and in the European Union]

    Bouchard JP.

    Encephale. 2009 Feb;35(1):18-24. Epub 2008 Apr 2. French. PMID: 19250989 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    19.

    The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

    Greenhalgh J.

    Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):115-23. Epub 2008 Dec 23.PMID: 19105048 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    20.

    Patient-centred outcomes in dietary research.

    Jackson JA, Kinn S, Dalgarno P.

    J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Apr;18(2):83-92. Review.PMID: 15788017 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]Related articles

    Display Settings:

    Format
    Items per page
    Sort by

    Send to:

    Choose Destination

    Supplemental Content

    Find related data